Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is the draw to DCI? Is it just to have somewhere to go for high school? Didn't IT middle score better than DCI?
NP. Re DCI -- for some having a high school path is really important, even if they know they may go elsewhere. DCI is a larger middle school than IT will be - so more social and extracurricular activities. There is also the IB curriculum.
As for test scores - only one year of data to compare due to switch to PARCC and DCI has a much more diverse population (more SN, more economically at risk, more ELL). You'd have to try and compare subgroups and I"m not sure there are enough students to do that.
This is an immersion / non-immersion decision.
No dog on this fight but what I know upper grades at Inspired are very diverse. I agree with PP, I would not choose a school for a 3 year old just for a high school path. There are enough options in the city for high school that I wouldn't make a long term bet just for that reason.
Not really! in just 6-7 years when jr high is on the horizon, you might really regret not having a middles school/high school path in place. I agree that this is just one consideration among many, and definitely fluid, but it's a big consideration.
Inspired has a middle school. DCI is no guarantee to be an option. I have friends that are opting out of DCI for Macfarland/Roosevelt.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is the draw to DCI? Is it just to have somewhere to go for high school? Didn't IT middle score better than DCI?
NP. Re DCI -- for some having a high school path is really important, even if they know they may go elsewhere. DCI is a larger middle school than IT will be - so more social and extracurricular activities. There is also the IB curriculum.
As for test scores - only one year of data to compare due to switch to PARCC and DCI has a much more diverse population (more SN, more economically at risk, more ELL). You'd have to try and compare subgroups and I"m not sure there are enough students to do that.
This is an immersion / non-immersion decision.
No dog on this fight but what I know upper grades at Inspired are very diverse. I agree with PP, I would not choose a school for a 3 year old just for a high school path. There are enough options in the city for high school that I wouldn't make a long term bet just for that reason.
Not really! in just 6-7 years when jr high is on the horizon, you might really regret not having a middles school/high school path in place. I agree that this is just one consideration among many, and definitely fluid, but it's a big consideration.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is the draw to DCI? Is it just to have somewhere to go for high school? Didn't IT middle score better than DCI?
NP. Re DCI -- for some having a high school path is really important, even if they know they may go elsewhere. DCI is a larger middle school than IT will be - so more social and extracurricular activities. There is also the IB curriculum.
As for test scores - only one year of data to compare due to switch to PARCC and DCI has a much more diverse population (more SN, more economically at risk, more ELL). You'd have to try and compare subgroups and I"m not sure there are enough students to do that.
This is an immersion / non-immersion decision.
No dog on this fight but what I know upper grades at Inspired are very diverse. I agree with PP, I would not choose a school for a 3 year old just for a high school path. There are enough options in the city for high school that I wouldn't make a long term bet just for that reason.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is the draw to DCI? Is it just to have somewhere to go for high school? Didn't IT middle score better than DCI?
NP. Re DCI -- for some having a high school path is really important, even if they know they may go elsewhere. DCI is a larger middle school than IT will be - so more social and extracurricular activities. There is also the IB curriculum.
As for test scores - only one year of data to compare due to switch to PARCC and DCI has a much more diverse population (more SN, more economically at risk, more ELL). You'd have to try and compare subgroups and I"m not sure there are enough students to do that.
This is an immersion / non-immersion decision.
Anonymous wrote:What is the draw to DCI? Is it just to have somewhere to go for high school? Didn't IT middle score better than DCI?
Anonymous wrote:That's a big difference in commutes. For me, the walk might make the difference.
But I think your level of desire for bilingual ed is also important. Personally I don't see it as viable long-term, unless the child has a native speaker at home. By your phrasing, it sounds like you might not actually be native speakers?
On the flip side, my understanding is that DCI is more viable for middle school options right now, which is important too. I'd want to take the long-term view and really investigate how the upper grades are at ITS and DCI and whether either of them will really be a place you want for jr high. It seems to me that a lot of these charter schools kind of peter out in the upper grades, in terms of instructional content that starts to be much more important as you get closer to HS (eg math).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are you sure it's a 15 minute drive? We drive past DCB every day on way to IT building and it takes us 7-8 minutes from DCB (Fort Totten-2nd-Harwood-4th).
No, I'm not. I really thought it was less because I used to do that commute and I thought it was less but Googlemaps tells me it's 11-12 minutes so I was adding a bit to that assuming the commute has increased since I did it ten years ago.
Anonymous wrote:Are you sure it's a 15 minute drive? We drive past DCB every day on way to IT building and it takes us 7-8 minutes from DCB (Fort Totten-2nd-Harwood-4th).