Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:While the Obama admin loves to tour the unemployment figures - which are heavily skewed because they don't count people who stopped looking for work - productivity slips yet again
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/productivity-declines-for-third-straight-quarter-2016-08-09
Just more of the same:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-08-09/the-u-s-economy-is-suffering-from-the-same-old-problem
Growth first quarter is only .5%
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-04-28/u-s-economy-grew-in-first-quarter-at-slowest-pace-in-two-years
Or maybe a little over 1%
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/06/28/final-reading-on-q1-2016-gdp.html
Still pretty anemic if you ask me.
Still far better off than we were 8 years ago!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Under a Hillary Clinton presidency, we will have more of the same Obama policies. Not a good thing for a true recovery.
And, our debt will continue to grow. Twenty TRILLION dollars is ridiculous. Pretty soon, our biggest expenditure will be interest on this debt. It is unsustainable and totally unfair to future generations.
I think Trump’s plan is worth a try. May not be perfect, but we know what we are getting with Hillary and it’s not good.
I’m ready for a change.
I have the same feelings about "productivity" that this person has about debt.
How much more productive can we get? People in "big" jobs already work 60 hour weeks. The "little" people work three jobs to survive. What in the world does productivity mean anymore?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Under a Hillary Clinton presidency, we will have more of the same Obama policies. Not a good thing for a true recovery.
And, our debt will continue to grow. Twenty TRILLION dollars is ridiculous. Pretty soon, our biggest expenditure will be interest on this debt. It is unsustainable and totally unfair to future generations.
I think Trump’s plan is worth a try. May not be perfect, but we know what we are getting with Hillary and it’s not good.
I’m ready for a change.
What's Trump proposing other than tax cuts and "cutting regulation" (i.e. the same old same old that was done in 2000-08, when the only job growth was in state/local governments?)
Anonymous wrote:Under a Hillary Clinton presidency, we will have more of the same Obama policies. Not a good thing for a true recovery.
And, our debt will continue to grow. Twenty TRILLION dollars is ridiculous. Pretty soon, our biggest expenditure will be interest on this debt. It is unsustainable and totally unfair to future generations.
I think Trump’s plan is worth a try. May not be perfect, but we know what we are getting with Hillary and it’s not good.
I’m ready for a change.
Anonymous wrote:Under a Hillary Clinton presidency, we will have more of the same Obama policies. Not a good thing for a true recovery.
And, our debt will continue to grow. Twenty TRILLION dollars is ridiculous. Pretty soon, our biggest expenditure will be interest on this debt. It is unsustainable and totally unfair to future generations.
I think Trump’s plan is worth a try. May not be perfect, but we know what we are getting with Hillary and it’s not good.
I’m ready for a change.
Anonymous wrote:It's hard to be productive when you need 3 part time jobs just to scrape by in Obama's economy.
Just keep repeating the Obama-bot mantra: "full recovery" and everything will be fine (in your parents basement.
"hope and change"
Anonymous wrote:While the Obama admin loves to tour the unemployment figures - which are heavily skewed because they don't count people who stopped looking for work - productivity slips yet again
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/productivity-declines-for-third-straight-quarter-2016-08-09
Just more of the same:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-08-09/the-u-s-economy-is-suffering-from-the-same-old-problem
Growth first quarter is only .5%
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-04-28/u-s-economy-grew-in-first-quarter-at-slowest-pace-in-two-years
Or maybe a little over 1%
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/06/28/final-reading-on-q1-2016-gdp.html
Still pretty anemic if you ask me.

Anonymous wrote:People betting HRC will win because then everything will be free and we won't need to be productive!
Anonymous wrote:Wow, digging pretty deep for bad economic news, huh? I suppose you missed the job numbers and the fact that labor participation rate has stabilized despite the continued retiring boomers.
We had massive gains in productivity during the recession and its aftermath because people looked for alternatives to hiring. Now companies are hiring more and investing less in labor saving. This will happen until wage growth pressures them to do otherwise.