Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Benghazi. And the fact she could give two shits about those poor men she left out there to die -- she was even incredulous that Congress was asking her questions. How dare they!!!

Please explain what EXACTLY about Benghazi makes you think she is "evil" and/or unqualified. I would truly like to understand.

+1 can't understand this.

Anonymous wrote:This is a serious answer, and I mean it genuinely. Read what she did to Juanita Broaddrick and Paula Jones.

(And definitely do this before you start crying about the next Brock Turner incident.)

I agree that HRC acted horrifically to the woman that were involved with her husband. But how do you reconcile this as your main issue versus how Trump treats/views women? I think they are essentially negating each other out on this point so don't see how this is the deciding factor against HRC.

Anonymous wrote:Benghazi. And the fact she could give two shits about those poor men she left out there to die -- she was even incredulous that Congress was asking her questions. How dare they!!!

Please explain what EXACTLY about Benghazi makes you think she is "evil" and/or unqualified. I would truly like to understand.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a serious answer, and I mean it genuinely. Read what she did to Juanita Broaddrick and Paula Jones.

(And definitely do this before you start crying about the next Brock Turner incident.)

Are you a big fan of fiction in general? Or do you lean more toward fantasy?

I'm not one to be so dismissive of rape victims, especially when there are multiple accounts of the same pattern. Maybe you are, but I think rape culture is disgusting.

Bill Clinton is a cheater and womanizing scumbag. Trump is a cheater and womanizing scumbag. Hillary (as so many wives of powerful men are) is the disrespected spouse. Yet somehow, sexist Americans are blaming her for her husband's indiscretions, and no mention of Trump's infidelities.
Check yourself and your double standards on women and men.

Anonymous wrote:Benghazi. And the fact she could give two shits about those poor men she left out there to die -- she was even incredulous that Congress was asking her questions. How dare they!!!

I think she only started being incredulous after the fifth or sixth investigation.

Anonymous wrote:Benghazi. And the fact she could give two shits about those poor men she left out there to die -- she was even incredulous that Congress was asking her questions. How dare they!!!

Why do you say she didn't care? That seems absurd. Here is a recent article.

My heart goes out to both of them. Losing a child under any circumstance, especially in this case — two State Department employees, extraordinary men, both of them, two CIA contractors gave their lives protecting our country, our values — I understand their grief and the incredible sense of loss that can motivate that," Clinton, the Democratic presidential nominee, said on "Fox News Sunday."

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/289905-clinton-doesnt-hold-ill-feelings-toward-mothers-who-blame

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a serious answer, and I mean it genuinely. Read what she did to Juanita Broaddrick and Paula Jones.

(And definitely do this before you start crying about the next Brock Turner incident.)

Are you a big fan of fiction in general? Or do you lean more toward fantasy?

I'm not one to be so dismissive of rape victims, especially when there are multiple accounts of the same pattern. Maybe you are, but I think rape culture is disgusting.

Juanita Broaddrick gave multiple conflicting accounts of the same incident. Paula Jones was not raped. This was all investigated by Ken Starr twenty years ago and he didn't file any charges.

Anonymous wrote:Because she's a woman and because she's going to win.
That alone is enough to spin wingnut heads off their axes.

Agree. It's the same reason the right wing doesn't really see Obama, a black man, as the leader of the US. Hillary has violated the rules about who can have power and authority over whom. Being a woman in power ies immoral according to certain codes and that's why they say "Lock her up!"

Read Lakoff on Trump and strict father morality -- very illuminating.

Anonymous wrote:Because she's a woman and because she's going to win.
That alone is enough to spin wingnut heads off their axes.

I'm hardly a wingnut. I voted for Obama twice.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a serious answer, and I mean it genuinely. Read what she did to Juanita Broaddrick and Paula Jones.

(And definitely do this before you start crying about the next Brock Turner incident.)

Are you a big fan of fiction in general? Or do you lean more toward fantasy?

I'm not one to be so dismissive of rape victims, especially when there are multiple accounts of the same pattern. Maybe you are, but I think rape culture is disgusting.

Benghazi. And the fact she could give two shits about those poor men she left out there to die -- she was even incredulous that Congress was asking her questions. How dare they!!!

Anonymous wrote:This is a serious answer, and I mean it genuinely. Read what she did to Juanita Broaddrick and Paula Jones.

(And definitely do this before you start crying about the next Brock Turner incident.)

Are you a big fan of fiction in general? Or do you lean more toward fantasy?

Because she's a woman and because she's going to win.
That alone is enough to spin wingnut heads off their axes.

This is a serious answer, and I mean it genuinely. Read what she did to Juanita Broaddrick and Paula Jones.

(And definitely do this before you start crying about the next Brock Turner incident.)

Serious question. I don't understand why people are calling Hilary evil. Pol Pot was evil, Hitler was evil, Pinochet was evil. I hardly put Hilary in the same category as those people. Please explain to me why you think Hilary is evil? I'm not a huge fan of her but to call her evil seems extreme.