Anonymous wrote:Okay, so the title is a bit harsh. Just wondering if others out there have in-laws that expect them to always have their grandchild brought to them. They live about 45mins to 1.5 hrs away, depending on traffic. Although they are in their late 60's, they get around elsewhere just fine, attend plenty of social events and get out of town often. They are both retired, though one works part-time. My husband and I are kinda fed up with the expectation that he has to drive our 8 month old over to them, and sometimes he flat out lies to his mom that he's busy. Oftentimes, we are playing catch-up on the weekend, and doing family stuff, and they are not very outdoorsy. Unless we are doing what they want, they don't really want to be bothered. I'm getting sick of it. On the other hand, it's nice to have an occasional day where gramma can watch my baby while I have some downtime, but that offer is never made. I have to ask. Other friends offer more than my mother-in-law does. It occurred to me that maybe they don't like me or like coming over, but they sure to fake it if it has to do with any aversion to me. How have you all handled this? If my folks lived in town, I wouldn't be able to get rid of them; they'd be all over their first and only grandchild. This is the first grandchild on both sides of the family.
Anonymous wrote:OP here - they typically make excuses when we invite them over. Either there's another event, or whatever. I only see them every 2-3 months or so, on average. My husband sees them about once a month or once every 2 months as well. When we've raised the issues, they claim they'll make an effort. Mother-in-law says its her bad knee and has to rely on FIL to drive (balony!). Sometimes they've even complained that they don't see their granddaughter often enough. That's their fault, in my opinion! thanks for the responses...
Anonymous wrote:Okay, so the title is a bit harsh. Just wondering if others out there have in-laws that expect them to always have their grandchild brought to them. They live about 45mins to 1.5 hrs away, depending on traffic. Although they are in their late 60's, they get around elsewhere just fine, attend plenty of social events and get out of town often. They are both retired, though one works part-time. My husband and I are kinda fed up with the expectation that he has to drive our 8 month old over to them, and sometimes he flat out lies to his mom that he's busy. Oftentimes, we are playing catch-up on the weekend, and doing family stuff, and they are not very outdoorsy. Unless we are doing what they want, they don't really want to be bothered. I'm getting sick of it. On the other hand, it's nice to have an occasional day where gramma can watch my baby while I have some downtime, but that offer is never made. I have to ask. Other friends offer more than my mother-in-law does. It occurred to me that maybe they don't like me or like coming over, but they sure to fake it if it has to do with any aversion to me. How have you all handled this? If my folks lived in town, I wouldn't be able to get rid of them; they'd be all over their first and only grandchild. This is the first grandchild on both sides of the family.
Anonymous wrote:Some parents just feel more comfortable in their house. I wouldn't take it personally. I'd just give them the family schedule in case they ever want to join in and plan some dinners with them. The weekends will just get more hectic as your child gets older.
Anonymous wrote:My parents just don't see it as their obligation to care for my children. Their idea of spoiling them is to get several Christmas gifts, which really isn't that extreme. They have busy social lives and they love their grandkids, but don't seem to see the day-to-day care as their issue. I wish they were more us-centric, but then, that's pretty me-centric to want, isn't it?
In your case, I'd probably decline to show up at their house all the time and invite them over sometimes to play and have a meal. But there's not a lot you can do to convince someone that your life should be the center (or even very prominent) in theirs, I figure.