Anonymous wrote:Often on DCUM I see comments suggesting that average high school students, by which I mean those with 2.8-3.4 GPA's and average or below average SAT/ACT scores, shouldn't be attending a four year college. Sometimes it's argued these kids would be better off learning a trade, or that they should go to a 2-year community college with the possibility of later transfer to a 4 year institution if they do well. I want to offer another perspective.
We have a nephew who struggled in high school. He had a learning disability, and as a result just didn't develop the academic skills needed to be successful in high school. I think his GPA when applying to colleges was something like 3.0 unweighted, and his ACT was around 26. Despite these challenges he managed to get into a small liberal arts college in the midwest. This Spring he graduated college with a 3.6 GPA and a job in marketing with a large NYC firm. The college environment, especially the small classes and freedom to develop his own interests, gave him so many opportunities to grow socially and academically. He is almost unrecognizable as the shy, insecure 18 year old he was at his high school.
My point is that kids don't all mature at the same rate. This kid was a late bloomer, and there are so many like him. College is for this type of student as well as for the high school high achievers. I'm thankful his parents encouraged him instead of writing him off.
Thank you OP! My kid struggled in HS, is a terrible standardized test taker, and we are hoping college is a better fit.