Anonymous wrote:OP, I made a similar error in causation about 4 years ago when I began working in an affluent school with many students with LD and ASD. Nearly all the mothers were older and there were many IVF twins and at least one set of triplets in each grade. I ignorantly thought it must be the fertility treatments, including (and I am deeply ashamed of this thought now), the idea that lower quality embryos had survived that without medical intervention wouldn't have implanted or would have spontaneously aborted. Luckily, I had a friend set me straight before I embarrassed myself or hurt someone's feelings. These kids were at my school because their parents could afford both AR and a school that met their children's SN. The AR didn't cause their SN. It didn't cause the kids at your school being LGBTQ.
Going through AR is tough enough, don't freak parents out that they've saddled their kids with a more difficult row to hoe in life.
Anonymous wrote:This seems really trollish to me, but I'll bite a little : You realize that sexuality does and has always existed on a bell curve, meaning that in general, MOST people are some degree of bi. Equal percentages of people would be homosexual or heterosexual.
So, to me, 20% hetero, 20% gay, and 60% lying somewhere in the middle seems perfectly reasonable.
Could also be not related to the meds - could be these "older moms" have learned in life that it's easier not to get hung up on things that don't really matter, and are letting their kids be who they are.
Anonymous wrote:Because there is no known or assumed link homosexuality and fertility treatments, fertility doctors are not going to latch onto your personal illogical opinion and transmit it to their patients. Perhaps if you took the foil hat off.
Anonymous wrote:I think you are substituting correlation with causation.
My husband and I are 40. We both can't remember any kid in our high school class who was gay, much less bi or trans. (We do know from Facebook that some of those kids did turn out to be gay, bi, and even one person was trans and now lives as a woman.) In contrast, DH's little sister is 17 years younger. When she was in high school, many kids were out and lots more were experimenting, even if they ultimately were heterosexual. It's not fertility drugs that changed kids. It's the culture of acceptance for sexual and gender identity that has changed and kids are reacting to it by being open about their feelings.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's almost as if older parents are richer and are more likely to be able to afford private school, and as if people with gender-nonconforming kids might seek out a specific progressive environment.
This. The kids are there because they are LGBT. They are not LGBT because their mothers are older, which you assume means they had fertility treatments.
Anonymous wrote:It's almost as if older parents are richer and are more likely to be able to afford private school, and as if people with gender-nonconforming kids might seek out a specific progressive environment.