Anonymous wrote:Sanders is a sore loser. He has been irrelevant since he lost by 15 points in CA. The old goat needs to SHUT UP. As far as his followers, they can vote for whomever they please. HRC will get more than enough moderate GOP votes to give her a resounding victory.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He got a lot, and it's a shame the OP didn't bother to acknowledge that. Failure to acknowledge the steps that Clinton's people have made is really a poor form of negotiation.
Sanders needs to give on TPP. Both candidates oppose it, and that's enough. Maybe he can get a firmer commitment to the minimum wage.
Please ...... get real! Hillary is not opposed to TPP and will push for it if she is elected with some minor cosmetic changes. Her purported opposition to it was just political expediency.
Your unwillingness to trust or compromise makes you a bad negotiating partner. Same goes for your candidate.
Ralph Nader similarly fought for the little guy. He gave us 8 years of Bush and the Iraq war.
How will feel about Sanders when he gives us Trump?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He got a lot, and it's a shame the OP didn't bother to acknowledge that. Failure to acknowledge the steps that Clinton's people have made is really a poor form of negotiation.
Sanders needs to give on TPP. Both candidates oppose it, and that's enough. Maybe he can get a firmer commitment to the minimum wage.
Please ...... get real! Hillary is not opposed to TPP and will push for it if she is elected with some minor cosmetic changes. Her purported opposition to it was just political expediency.
Anonymous wrote:He got a lot, and it's a shame the OP didn't bother to acknowledge that. Failure to acknowledge the steps that Clinton's people have made is really a poor form of negotiation.
Sanders needs to give on TPP. Both candidates oppose it, and that's enough. Maybe he can get a firmer commitment to the minimum wage.