Anonymous wrote:You mean most one percenters per capita?

Or wealth extremes?

Extremes, for the most part, obviously not people who live in poverty. But also the upper middle class that is more out of control, whether they can afford it or not.

My vote is for New York. While most people are down to earth and not spoiled, there are still a whole lot who are really in the stratosphere on being out of touch, e.g. Donald J. Trump.

My second guess would be Newark, NJ and Trenton, NJ. The people I have met from this area act like they own the world but are unusually dim. It's such an odd combination of character traits and I've easily met 10-15 people from this area who are like this.

NY, LA.

PP here. SF is bad because a lot of the successful people got rich young and were always stars. They never had to struggle, or even work in a normal setting without a zillion perks. I briefly lived in a very rich Silicon valley town as well as the city of sf.

SF is pretty awful especially after the Facebook era. Worse than West LA, DC and Manhattan. I've lived in all those.

We have a ton of regular workaday schlubs (including myself) just trying to get back and forth on Metro, not always successfully. So not DC. I would say LA or San Francisco. LA just seems very vain and superficial.

NYC hands down. Manhattan -- excluding Harlem -- is a bubble and people very quickly lose touch with what's happening in the country outside that bubble. I say this living in DC now -- some of that exists here but MUCH MUCH less.

Washington DC and its close in suburbs

Gotta be San Fran

You mean most one percenters per capita?

Or wealth extremes?

San Francisco has become the Land of the Douchebag -- gets my vote.

New York. dc seems very normal to me and I lived in NY previously.

Anonymous wrote:DC.

+1.

DC.

Which city do you think it is, the city with most spoiled residents, most out of touch with the real world values and most entitled? I think New York, LA, San Francisco, D.C. What do you think?