Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How have the communications been to families about getting their kids tested and generally keeping them informed about what's going on?
As someone who lived through the lead water issue a few years back and had an extremely high number in the home with small kids living there full time -- your child should have had a blood test at their physical (mandated by DC law). Even with our elevated number the kids were fine.
Anonymous wrote:How have the communications been to families about getting their kids tested and generally keeping them informed about what's going on?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Also the school is relocating for renovation.
That doesn't matter if kids have already been exposed.
Don't they test and remedy every year?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Also the school is relocating for renovation.
That doesn't matter if kids have already been exposed.
Anonymous wrote:Also the school is relocating for renovation.
Anonymous wrote:The lead issue originally found in the 3 hill schools has expanded to 12, and it looks like Marie Reed and others have elevated lead levels. http://dgs.dc.gov/sites/default/files/dc/sites/dgs/page_content/attachments/SY%202016%20Lead%20in%20Water%20Sampling%20Results%20-%20DCPS%20-%20In%20Progress%20-%204-19-16.pdf
Q to current Marie Reed families, has the school/DCPS contacted you about this and what are their plans to correct this?
Anonymous wrote:The lead issue originally found in the 3 hill schools has expanded to 12, and it looks like Marie Reed and others have elevated lead levels. http://dgs.dc.gov/sites/default/files/dc/sites/dgs/page_content/attachments/SY%202016%20Lead%20in%20Water%20Sampling%20Results%20-%20DCPS%20-%20In%20Progress%20-%204-19-16.pdf
Q to current Marie Reed families, has the school/DCPS contacted you about this and what are their plans to correct this?