Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DCPS is desperate. They are trying anything and everything except the obvious...the inclusion classrooms DON'T WORK! It's a stupid idea. Take the really at risk kids and give them the services they need so that everyone, including at risk kids can get the damned education that they deserve!
We don't need an extended school year. We need a system that works instead of this sad veneer of success over a rotten infrastructure.
They are following the model that's been successfully done at charters with similar populations (DC Prep and Kipp, to name a couple).
Also I think you need to look up what inclusion means - it has NOTHING to do with at-risk kids.
+1, except that those charters are more extended day than extended year. If we had to have one at our school, i'd choose extended day over extended year. The reason why DCPS is doing year versus day may be the union contract.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DCPS is desperate. They are trying anything and everything except the obvious...the inclusion classrooms DON'T WORK! It's a stupid idea. Take the really at risk kids and give them the services they need so that everyone, including at risk kids can get the damned education that they deserve!
We don't need an extended school year. We need a system that works instead of this sad veneer of success over a rotten infrastructure.
They are following the model that's been successfully done at charters with similar populations (DC Prep and Kipp, to name a couple).
Also I think you need to look up what inclusion means - it has NOTHING to do with at-risk kids.
+1, except that those charters are more extended day than extended year. If we had to have one at our school, i'd choose extended day over extended year. The reason why DCPS is doing year versus day may be the union contract.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DCPS is desperate. They are trying anything and everything except the obvious...the inclusion classrooms DON'T WORK! It's a stupid idea. Take the really at risk kids and give them the services they need so that everyone, including at risk kids can get the damned education that they deserve!
We don't need an extended school year. We need a system that works instead of this sad veneer of success over a rotten infrastructure.
They are following the model that's been successfully done at charters with similar populations (DC Prep and Kipp, to name a couple).
Also I think you need to look up what inclusion means - it has NOTHING to do with at-risk kids.
+1, except that those charters are more extended day than extended year. If we had to have one at our school, i'd choose extended day over extended year. The reason why DCPS is doing year versus day may be the union contract.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DCPS is desperate. They are trying anything and everything except the obvious...the inclusion classrooms DON'T WORK! It's a stupid idea. Take the really at risk kids and give them the services they need so that everyone, including at risk kids can get the damned education that they deserve!
We don't need an extended school year. We need a system that works instead of this sad veneer of success over a rotten infrastructure.
They are following the model that's been successfully done at charters with similar populations (DC Prep and Kipp, to name a couple).
Also I think you need to look up what inclusion means - it has NOTHING to do with at-risk kids.
Anonymous wrote:DCPS is desperate. They are trying anything and everything except the obvious...the inclusion classrooms DON'T WORK! It's a stupid idea. Take the really at risk kids and give them the services they need so that everyone, including at risk kids can get the damned education that they deserve!
We don't need an extended school year. We need a system that works instead of this sad veneer of success over a rotten infrastructure.