Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In a traditional school, the curriculum (therefore the teacher and standardized tests) are the focus of the school day. The teacher often stands at the front of the room and primarily gives instructions. The main goal is for kids to follow directions and learn the material. Like the catholic school I went to. Traditional schools can be any school - private or public.
In a non-traditional school (like Montessori or Inquiry), the focus is on the student. Students and their questions inform the curriculum and what happens in the classrooms. The teachers are more facilitators of learning that instructors. The children lead and the teacher follows in these classes.
Are any schools "traditional" in the way your describe anymore?
Anonymous wrote:This concerns me. I'm thinking an inquiry based approach may be excellent for my child and am eagerly watching my inspired teaching lottery number. Is there any way me and my child could visit for a day and I could watch her participating?
Anonymous wrote:In a traditional school, the curriculum (therefore the teacher and standardized tests) are the focus of the school day. The teacher often stands at the front of the room and primarily gives instructions. The main goal is for kids to follow directions and learn the material. Like the catholic school I went to. Traditional schools can be any school - private or public.
In a non-traditional school (like Montessori or Inquiry), the focus is on the student. Students and their questions inform the curriculum and what happens in the classrooms. The teachers are more facilitators of learning that instructors. The children lead and the teacher follows in these classes.
Anonymous wrote:This concerns me. I'm thinking an inquiry based approach may be excellent for my child and am eagerly watching my inspired teaching lottery number. Is there any way me and my child could visit for a day and I could watch her participating?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anyone have positive reviews of this type of learning for early elementary especially? I thought I'd love it, but it's just too hard for my young child who is more of a concrete thinker to grasp the concepts through type of learning. I think it's better suited to fit older elementary/middle school students.
??? I don't understand your question. I found inquiry learning to be very concrete. My DC uses manipulatives or hands-on games for most of his learning. The teachers are given flexibility to make learning individual for each student by asking them questions and tailoring lessons to each child's (or the whole classroom's) needs. Inquiry works great for early elementary school. Kids normally ask a lot of questions about their world. With inquiry, teachers are told to answer each question and delve deeper to teach expanded concepts. The teacher can then use whatever he/she thinks will communicate the concepts best - playing a game, writing in a journal, reading a specific book, doing art, etc. I like that it's concrete but flexible.
Anonymous wrote:Does anyone have positive reviews of this type of learning for early elementary especially? I thought I'd love it, but it's just too hard for my young child who is more of a concrete thinker to grasp the concepts through type of learning. I think it's better suited to fit older elementary/middle school students.
Anonymous wrote:Yes, CMI and Two Rivers use a similar approach. You'll likely find this in most non-traditional WOTP schools as well.