Anonymous wrote:Most important...he's older than dirt. Too old to be running.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He's what I want the Democrats to be. I hope it happens. Because the Dems present themselves with a veneer of progressivism, they might as well walk the walk AND talk the talk. But they don't want to give up their mainlining source of $$$. It's all about power.
i don't get this. He's a socialist. Form a socialists party if you don't like the democrats.
Yep, I agree with this. To the PP, are you gonna walk the walk? Pay all that "progressive-ism" with higher taxes? Probably not...
Most important...he's older than dirt. Too old to be running.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He's what I want the Democrats to be. I hope it happens. Because the Dems present themselves with a veneer of progressivism, they might as well walk the walk AND talk the talk. But they don't want to give up their mainlining source of $$$. It's all about power.
i don't get this. He's a socialist. Form a socialists party if you don't like the democrats.
Anonymous wrote:
The Republicans are arguing about who is a "true conservative" and the Democrats are arguing about who is a "true Democrat". Do we all have to fit into neat little boxes? Can't we think outside the box a bit? Aren't these parties and politics dynamic? Because our country sure as heck is not the same as it was.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Democratic socialists.
I think of Sanders as many things. No, he's not a god, no he's not infallible, no he's not perfect, and no, I don't agree with him on everything.
I do see him as a whistleblower. I think he can clean up the Democratic party. I think he exposes corruption and cronyism that is that core of the Democratic machine (no, still not as sh!tastic as the GOP, but that's not a high bar, is it). I think there is a level of "willful blindness" that the party faithful submit themselves to, and it permits the "establishment" to run as it has for along time with the apparent support (really, just blindness) of the people.
The Occupy Wall Streeters had enough. Black Lives Matter had enough. I think this group is growing.
I'm sorry Sanders offends you. On the other hand, maybe that's what means he's doing his job.
Are you seriously suggesting that BS is helping BLM? Because, no.
Anonymous wrote:Democratic socialists.
I think of Sanders as many things. No, he's not a god, no he's not infallible, no he's not perfect, and no, I don't agree with him on everything.
I do see him as a whistleblower. I think he can clean up the Democratic party. I think he exposes corruption and cronyism that is that core of the Democratic machine (no, still not as sh!tastic as the GOP, but that's not a high bar, is it). I think there is a level of "willful blindness" that the party faithful submit themselves to, and it permits the "establishment" to run as it has for along time with the apparent support (really, just blindness) of the people.
The Occupy Wall Streeters had enough. Black Lives Matter had enough. I think this group is growing.
I'm sorry Sanders offends you. On the other hand, maybe that's what means he's doing his job.
Anonymous wrote:He's what I want the Democrats to be. I hope it happens. Because the Dems present themselves with a veneer of progressivism, they might as well walk the walk AND talk the talk. But they don't want to give up their mainlining source of $$$. It's all about power.