Anonymous wrote:How is a lady who *used to* read the news decades ago remotely qualified to serve in Congress?!?!

Befuddling.

I would imagine that the desire to claim a Congressional seat stems from a need to compensate for Mr. Matthews' inability to do so.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What will she do to reduce the alcohol-related car crashes? Anything? Has she even been vocal about this?

Who cares? Would never vote for because of her husband.

I care about the alcohol-related car crashes and needless killing of innocent people. Do you do alcohol and drive?

Please stop Raskin (or whatever) supporter. Alcohol is legal to sell and is in fact sold by the Montgomery County Government. Where is your outrage towards Ike Legget and the rest. This issue is much like cell phones that people use to text while driving and cause deaths as well.

You are over-reaching with this nonsense and you look silly. Your agenda is transparent.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What will she do to reduce the alcohol-related car crashes? Anything? Has she even been vocal about this?

Who cares? Would never vote for because of her husband.

I care about the alcohol-related car crashes and needless killing of innocent people. Do you do alcohol and drive?

How is a lady who *used to* read the news decades ago remotely qualified to serve in Congress?!?!

Befuddling.

Anonymous wrote:What will she do to reduce the alcohol-related car crashes? Anything? Has she even been vocal about this?

Who cares? Would never vote for because of her husband.

Anonymous wrote:Why did the Post article today focus on his money when the Matthews family is LOADED?

Not half as LOADED as Trone.

Anonymous wrote:Why did the Post article today focus on his money when the Matthews family is LOADED?

Because Kathleen is in the establishment.

How do these slightly above average people make so much money as idiot pundits? Truly amazing.

Why did the Post article today focus on his money when the Matthews family is LOADED?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Okay OP, you are either against Trone, since he made his fortune selling wine, or you are against him and are trying to make an argument that Trone supports drunk driving since he sells wine.

What's the deal?

I am sure both oppose drunk driving and support laws that punish them.

Next.

Please show us where Trone has ever supported more effective consequences for intoxicated drivers. Thaow me whrnk you.

He has been in the private sector and hasn't made many political statements on this or other issues. I am quite sure he opposes drunk driving

Show where he has supported lax drunk driving standards.

This whole thread was started by a troll that is trying to drum up opposition to Trone with this foolishness. I guess he must be doing well in the polls if this is the best you have. BTW, I support him.

Anonymous wrote:Okay OP, you are either against Trone, since he made his fortune selling wine, or you are against him and are trying to make an argument that Trone supports drunk driving since he sells wine.

What's the deal?

I am sure both oppose drunk driving and support laws that punish them.

Next.

Please show us where Trone has ever supported more effective consequences for intoxicated drivers. Thank you.

Okay OP, you are either against Trone, since he made his fortune selling wine, or you are against him and are trying to make an argument that Trone supports drunk driving since he sells wine.

What's the deal?

I am sure both oppose drunk driving and support laws that punish them.

Next.

This is your one issue when voting for the U.S. Congress? Talk to your state legislators and state senator instead.

She was on the news for years so maybe some connections through her contacts. Not sure.

Haven't heard anything. But she's running for Congress. Not a local seat.

What will she do to reduce the alcohol-related car crashes? Anything? Has she even been vocal about this?