Anonymous
03/02/2016 11:35
Subject: Re:Thoughts on this package
Anonymous wrote:
Looks good with strong WISC and Cogat. I think it is an IN.
+1
Anonymous
02/29/2016 13:32
Subject: Re:Thoughts on this package
Looks good with strong WISC and Cogat. I think it is an IN.
Anonymous
02/29/2016 13:09
Subject: Thoughts on this package
110 NNAT
140 CogAT
138 WISC
Strong work samples
GBRS unknown yet