Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Troll Post.
True nonsense.
Honestly, every private school has a communications director and that is who takes the photos for the website.
PP claim its another mother. Nonsense. Only an idiot would believe this. Don't you know that their kids on a no photo list whose parents have barred them from being photographed. Do you honestly think any DC private would risk liability by allowing a class mom to juts randomly photograph and post on the school website. LOL
Not to mention, the website is a marketing tool and the demographics in the photos have to match the schools states figures/ image
I'm pretty sure the OP was talking about the internal part of the website that is only for current students, not the public website that is for the general public. Most schools have a place on the internal site where teachers, parents, or classroom volunteers can post pictures from classroom activities or trips. I know my kid's school has this, but I think the teacher does a good job trying to get some pictures of all the kids. When I have attended events, I know the pictures I send to the teacher to post are mostly of my kid and his friends. Maybe some parents are sending in more pictures than others.
Anonymous wrote:I had this situation happen with newsletters that were copied and sent home to all parents. After the third one, I took them to the teacher and talked with her about it. There was a mom who was taking photos and putting the newsletter together and the teacher was so thankful to have it that she didn't notice. I felt it was her job to notice and to make sure that my son and all kids were present, and not just the photo mom's daughter and her friends. The issues in the future were better. It does hurt to not see you child. Talk to the teacher.
Anonymous wrote:Troll Post.
True nonsense.
Honestly, every private school has a communications director and that is who takes the photos for the website.
PP claim its another mother. Nonsense. Only an idiot would believe this. Don't you know that their kids on a no photo list whose parents have barred them from being photographed. Do you honestly think any DC private would risk liability by allowing a class mom to juts randomly photograph and post on the school website. LOL
Not to mention, the website is a marketing tool and the demographics in the photos have to match the schools states figures/ image
Anonymous wrote:Each week I go to the school site to see the pics from the week and I never see any pics of my child! I see the same kids all the time. The school photographer clearly has certain kids that they prefer to take pictures of, but it seems like it's only the popular kids or kids of the super wealthy parents who are selected. Should I mention this to the school? It really is sickening.
Anonymous wrote:Troll Post.
True nonsense.
Honestly, every private school has a communications director and that is who takes the photos for the website.
PP claim its another mother. Nonsense. Only an idiot would believe this. Don't you know that their kids on a no photo list whose parents have barred them from being photographed. Do you honestly think any DC private would risk liability by allowing a class mom to juts randomly photograph and post on the school website. LOL
Not to mention, the website is a marketing tool and the demographics in the photos have to match the schools states figures/ image
Anonymous wrote:Each week I go to the school site to see the pics from the week and I never see any pics of my child! I see the same kids all the time. The school photographer clearly has certain kids that they prefer to take pictures of, but it seems like it's only the popular kids or kids of the super wealthy parents who are selected. Should I mention this to the school? It really is sickening.