Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Almost everybody is against this. The question is, what will be the effect of adding jail time as a possible penalty for doing this?
I don't support the bill.
So you are against parents throwing parties but against the possibility of a harsher sentence to possibly prevent them? That makes a lot of sense.
Two kids died at a party with a parent there. He willingly let them drink shots and beer in his home and then drive home drunk. He told his daughter to let them all go home knowing they were drunk.
He wrote a check for $5,000 and walked out of the court room. You think that is enough to deter parents from doing it?
Yes, because I don't think that it would prevent them. I don't think that the possibility of jail time is an effective deterrent. And I also don't think that we need to put more people in jail.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Almost everybody is against this. The question is, what will be the effect of adding jail time as a possible penalty for doing this?
I don't support the bill.
So you are against parents throwing parties but against the possibility of a harsher sentence to possibly prevent them? That makes a lot of sense.
Two kids died at a party with a parent there. He willingly let them drink shots and beer in his home and then drive home drunk. He told his daughter to let them all go home knowing they were drunk.
He wrote a check for $5,000 and walked out of the court room. You think that is enough to deter parents from doing it?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
So, what's your solution? Nothing? Why does there need to be a solution?
There doesn't need to be a solution, of course. For example, you might believe that it's not a problem if parents allow teenagers to have parties with alcohol at their homes. Or, you might believe that it is a problem, but it's a problem that doesn't need to be solved.
Until it happens to you - but then it is too late. Parents like you that say "no big deal" or whatever, not my problem" are just as guilty. It takes a village to raise kids. If some parents are letting your kids drink in their homes unbeknownst to you, how are suppose to help them? It is one thing to be peer pressured with teens your age. It is really hard for kids to say no when there are parents encouraging drinking right in their own homes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
So, what's your solution? Nothing? Why does there need to be a solution?
There doesn't need to be a solution, of course. For example, you might believe that it's not a problem if parents allow teenagers to have parties with alcohol at their homes. Or, you might believe that it is a problem, but it's a problem that doesn't need to be solved.
Anonymous wrote:Almost everybody is against this. The question is, what will be the effect of adding jail time as a possible penalty for doing this?
I don't support the bill.
Anonymous wrote:
So, what's your solution? Nothing? Why does there need to be a solution?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Almost everybody is against this. The question is, what will be the effect of adding jail time as a possible penalty for doing this?
I don't support the bill.
? the point would be some parents won't do it for fear of jail time?
Yes, obviously the ostensible idea is that the possibility of jail time would deter parents from doing this.
But would it actually (and how do you know?) Also, who would go to jail and who wouldn't?
The other idea is that we need to put people in jail to show that we as a society are serious about this. But I don't think that we as a society need to lock more people up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Almost everybody is against this. The question is, what will be the effect of adding jail time as a possible penalty for doing this?
I don't support the bill.
? the point would be some parents won't do it for fear of jail time?
Anonymous wrote:Almost everybody is against this. The question is, what will be the effect of adding jail time as a possible penalty for doing this?
I don't support the bill.