Anonymous wrote:I believe the point from the other thread, according to one poster, was so you could live in a house rather than a condo. That seemed to be the main selling point.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I agree. I can't help but wonder if it's like "I've made this life choice and I'm stuck with it so now you have to be too!" Or at the very least, "I want this thing (having a husband) to give me some kind of social value or status, so I'm going to make not having one sound absolutely horrible".
It seems very.... suspicious to me. Especially because the reasoning behind "you have to get married" often seems to be "married people will ostracize you if you don't", which comes off as more like a threat.
Pssst.... you're completely wrong....
Anonymous wrote:I agree. I can't help but wonder if it's like "I've made this life choice and I'm stuck with it so now you have to be too!" Or at the very least, "I want this thing (having a husband) to give me some kind of social value or status, so I'm going to make not having one sound absolutely horrible".
It seems very.... suspicious to me. Especially because the reasoning behind "you have to get married" often seems to be "married people will ostracize you if you don't", which comes off as more like a threat.
Anonymous wrote:Reading the quality men thread and kind of shocked. Why are educated women with means to become economically self sufficient so eager to find a husband/mate? In today's world, an educated woman with a good earning potential doesn't NEED a man to survive or be happy.
Is it the older women on dcum that are still trying to drill old fashioned ideas of dependency on men into younger women's heads?
I find it so backwards and regressive. Let's not stop our young women from living happy independent lives where they can build a nice for themselves with or without a man!