Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No worries, pp. Every shelter checks for residency...especially for families. DC, MD and VA all check for residency. They also collaborate on a regional level.
It's a myth that homeless people are "from someplace else."
Wait. If these people are homeless, how can they have “residency?"
Anonymous wrote:No worries, pp. Every shelter checks for residency...especially for families. DC, MD and VA all check for residency. They also collaborate on a regional level.
It's a myth that homeless people are "from someplace else."
Anonymous wrote:No worries, pp. Every shelter checks for residency...especially for families. DC, MD and VA all check for residency. They also collaborate on a regional level.
It's a myth that homeless people are "from someplace else."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Before we open more shelter doors I hope they first look at whether those to whom we open doors are even from DC in the first place.
I'm fine with taking care of DC's existing homeless, but do we need to take care of the homeless for the entire eastern seaboard?
It's enough of an issue that we have well meaning but underfunded organizations that want to bring people here in order to take care of them.
It's enough of an issue that we fall victim to some other communities that bus their homeless here (and yes, it's common practice for police to round up homeless and put them on a bus with a one way ticket to the next biggest city).
Existing DC homeless families should have first crack.
I also think that the city needs to work on finding more ways to get people self sufficient and functional.
Sorry.
If you are a rich DC liberal who is okay with amnesty and open borders, Syrian refugees and all those other "take care of others" type programs, then you have zero right to complain of homeless from outside your borders being taken care of in your DC homeless shelter. You need to practice what you preach.
Anonymous wrote:Before we open more shelter doors I hope they first look at whether those to whom we open doors are even from DC in the first place.
I'm fine with taking care of DC's existing homeless, but do we need to take care of the homeless for the entire eastern seaboard?
It's enough of an issue that we have well meaning but underfunded organizations that want to bring people here in order to take care of them.
It's enough of an issue that we fall victim to some other communities that bus their homeless here (and yes, it's common practice for police to round up homeless and put them on a bus with a one way ticket to the next biggest city).
Existing DC homeless families should have first crack.
I also think that the city needs to work on finding more ways to get people self sufficient and functional.
jsteele wrote:This seems like a great plan and I commend the Bowser administration for it.