Anonymous wrote:I am new to a middle management role. I have been meeting with everyone in my group to find out what they work on, and apprise myself of issues that might come up in the future. One individual brought up a bad evaluation they received multiple years ago that was completely unexpected and not well justified. The compensation that year was consistent with the bad review. Management was also in flux at that time. This individual didn't contest the review out of insecurity and shock but it has been eating at them for years. My experience with this individual's work has been very positive and past evaluations other than this one, support that. I want to make this right going forward but also need to handle it sensitively since they feel silly about not having brought it up immediately and letting it fester like this. I don't have a lot of power here. Any thoughts? Do I need to be direct with our superviser about it?
Anonymous wrote:Hmm ^^ it's a good question what they want me to do. They made it clear that this has been plaguing them. I do think the slightly bigger raise would do it but I just give inputs, I'm not the decision point there. But maybe that's where I will focus my energy. Also I want this person to know I am making a good faith effort even if little is achieved. As pps have said, knowing it won't happen again should go a long way towards rectifying. Thanks again, helps to talk this out anonymously!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What sort of resolution are you hoping for?
Really all I want is to make this person feel that management appreciates them. I guess ideally, an apology from our boss (who was not the reviewer) and a slightly bigger than normal raise. But I'm open to suggestions on what make this person feel able to move on from this. -OP
Nobody in a management position will ever admit to that. Unless the person who wrote the review personally admits that the review was not accurate, there is no recourse that can be taken short of a lawsuit by the employee. And even then, without proof, the suit would be tossed.
Nobody wants a lawsuit. Like I said, I want this person to be able to move on from this. And I appreciate the advice that will keep me from looking like I'm over reacting. I could go to the reviewer and ask them to explain it, but I think I can't do that without violating the confidence of the person.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What sort of resolution are you hoping for?
Really all I want is to make this person feel that management appreciates them. I guess ideally, an apology from our boss (who was not the reviewer) and a slightly bigger than normal raise. But I'm open to suggestions on what make this person feel able to move on from this. -OP
Nobody in a management position will ever admit to that. Unless the person who wrote the review personally admits that the review was not accurate, there is no recourse that can be taken short of a lawsuit by the employee. And even then, without proof, the suit would be tossed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What sort of resolution are you hoping for?
Really all I want is to make this person feel that management appreciates them. I guess ideally, an apology from our boss (who was not the reviewer) and a slightly bigger than normal raise. But I'm open to suggestions on what make this person feel able to move on from this. -OP
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What sort of resolution are you hoping for?
Really all I want is to make this person feel that management appreciates them. I guess ideally, an apology from our boss (who was not the reviewer) and a slightly bigger than normal raise. But I'm open to suggestions on what make this person feel able to move on from this. -OP
Anonymous wrote:What exactly are you expected to do about it? Change a years-old evaluation and compensate for an underwhelming bonus? There is absolutely nothing you can do about it. It was years ago. All you can do is give the person a fair evaluation from now on.
Anonymous wrote:What sort of resolution are you hoping for?