Um, what. The defense is going after the intoxication assertion. Count on it.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It will have to be proven that the victim was intoxicated.
"The victim refused, telling Ballinger that she was "not interested" and "too intoxicated," the court documents say"
Um, what? If she refused, she can give any reason she likes. It doesn't have to be "proven" that she was intoxicated.
What difference does it make? Humanities people go to MIT.Anonymous wrote:Slightly off topic, but apparently his major was Hotel Administration.
Who goes to an Ivy for Hotel Administration?
Anonymous wrote:Very sad if it's true. Very sad if it's not.
I'm surprised that it was this fraternity. In the past they were smart, successful, nice guys. Not a sleazy sports fraternity at all.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Slightly off topic, but apparently his major was Hotel Administration.
Who goes to an Ivy for Hotel Administration?
You obviously know nothing about Cornell. That's something it's well-known for.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Slightly off topic, but apparently his major was Hotel Administration.
Who goes to an Ivy for Hotel Administration?
You obviously know nothing about Cornell. That's something it's well-known for.
Anonymous wrote:It will have to be proven that the victim was intoxicated.
"The victim refused, telling Ballinger that she was "not interested" and "too intoxicated," the court documents say"
Anonymous wrote:Slightly off topic, but apparently his major was Hotel Administration.
Who goes to an Ivy for Hotel Administration?
Anonymous wrote:Slightly off topic, but apparently his major was Hotel Administration.
Who goes to an Ivy for Hotel Administration?
Anonymous wrote:Slightly off topic, but apparently his major was Hotel Administration.
Who goes to an Ivy for Hotel Administration?