Anonymous wrote:If there were no charters, I think we would have a majority middle/high SES elementary school (Watkins). The demographics exist in the neighborhood but so many of the kids end up somewhere else starting in pk3, pk4 and K. I don't think the neighborhood would have gentrified to this extent without charters, but I would love to see them abolished tomorrow and see how things shake out. Sadly that ship has sailed.
Anonymous wrote:If there were no charters, I think we would have a majority middle/high SES elementary school (Watkins). The demographics exist in the neighborhood but so many of the kids end up somewhere else starting in pk3, pk4 and K. I don't think the neighborhood would have gentrified to this extent without charters, but I would love to see them abolished tomorrow and see how things shake out. Sadly that ship has sailed.
Anonymous wrote:Vote here!
Definitely the latter camp here. We go to a WOTP DCPS but live in ward 1. I'm pretty sure if all the high SES kids went to our IB school, we'd have a great walkable option.
Anonymous wrote:Charters keeping me in the city. We live EOTP, and even if every high SES person in our neighborhood went to our IB, it would still be a terrible school.
Anonymous wrote:Overall #2. But it's catch 22. DCPS in our neighborhood is good (Shepherd) although many historically have and will continue to always go private. Citywide, if it weren't for charters I don't think DCPS would even be competitive as they are today.
Anonymous wrote:Vote here!
Definitely the latter camp here. We go to a WOTP DCPS but live in ward 1. I'm pretty sure if all the high SES kids went to our IB school, we'd have a great walkable option.