Anonymous wrote:Obama's "criminal justice reform" has already released 6,000 convicted felons onto America's streets.
Convicts - who would otherwise be in prison right now.
And DeBlasio is busy dis-mantling the exact programs that vastly reduced crime in NYC.
So it is no surprise that the crime rate is going up.
We are now led to believe that the solution to increasing crime is simply to "throw money at the problem" ??
This "solution" is utterly stupid. If this idea is representative of "progressive thinking," then count me out.
Anonymous wrote:Based on a successful program in California. I wonder who would be a beneficiary of the program?
http://wtop.com/dc/2016/02/dc-bill-would-pay-people-stipends-not-to-commit-crimes/
The D.C. Council voted unanimously Tuesday to approve a bill that includes a proposal to pay residents a stipend not to commit crimes. It’s based on a program in Richmond, California, that advocates say has contributed to deep reductions in crime there.
Under the bill, city officials would identify up to 200 people a year who are considered at risk of either committing or becoming victims of violent crime. Those people would be directed to participate in behavioral therapy and other programs. If they fulfill those obligations and stay out of trouble, they would be paid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Google "Office of Neighborhood Safety"
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/05/opinion/sunday/to-stop-crime-hand-over-cash.html?_r=0
From the program's director (emphasis mine):
.In 2014, we celebrated the lowest number of firearm assaults and homicides in more than four decades. Richmond recorded a 76 percent reduction in homicides and a 69 percent reduction in firearm assaults from 2007, when the Office of Neighborhood Safety was created.
In reality, we’ve achieved these results not simply by the cash incentive. Our change agents work with about 150 clients a year, at a cost of about $20,000 per person, which pays for daily mentoring, coaching and companionship. By comparison, it costs our city about $200,000 to hire one new police officer
Not arguing if this is good or bad, but the bolded quote shows just how immune to caring about the cost the people implementing it are, since the $200,000 cited is but a fraction of the three million dollars the program costs. Do they not know how to multiply 20,000 by 150?
Anonymous wrote:Google "Office of Neighborhood Safety"
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/05/opinion/sunday/to-stop-crime-hand-over-cash.html?_r=0
From the program's director (emphasis mine):
.In 2014, we celebrated the lowest number of firearm assaults and homicides in more than four decades. Richmond recorded a 76 percent reduction in homicides and a 69 percent reduction in firearm assaults from 2007, when the Office of Neighborhood Safety was created.
In reality, we’ve achieved these results not simply by the cash incentive. Our change agents work with about 150 clients a year, at a cost of about $20,000 per person, which pays for daily mentoring, coaching and companionship. By comparison, it costs our city about $200,000 to hire one new police officer
.In 2014, we celebrated the lowest number of firearm assaults and homicides in more than four decades. Richmond recorded a 76 percent reduction in homicides and a 69 percent reduction in firearm assaults from 2007, when the Office of Neighborhood Safety was created.
In reality, we’ve achieved these results not simply by the cash incentive. Our change agents work with about 150 clients a year, at a cost of about $20,000 per person, which pays for daily mentoring, coaching and companionship. By comparison, it costs our city about $200,000 to hire one new police officer
Anonymous wrote:We already pay for welfare, food stamps, housing, phones, etc, now we gotta pay for them to not kill, rape and steal. Wow! Liberals
Anonymous wrote:We already pay for welfare, food stamps, housing, phones, etc, now we gotta pay for them to not kill, rape and steal. Wow! Liberals
Anonymous wrote:We already pay for welfare, food stamps, housing, phones, etc, now we gotta pay for them to not kill, rape and steal. Wow! Liberals
The D.C. Council voted unanimously Tuesday to approve a bill that includes a proposal to pay residents a stipend not to commit crimes. It’s based on a program in Richmond, California, that advocates say has contributed to deep reductions in crime there.
Under the bill, city officials would identify up to 200 people a year who are considered at risk of either committing or becoming victims of violent crime. Those people would be directed to participate in behavioral therapy and other programs. If they fulfill those obligations and stay out of trouble, they would be paid.