Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
A Child is a Child is a Child....
no matter what stage of development.
My rights STOP where yours BEGIN....
no matter your age or stage of development.
If the father is obligated to support that child,
why shouldn't the mother at least refrain from
commiting the violent act of ending that child's life?
Whatever you want to call "it" makes no difference
to the child who IS a dependent life, as any minor child is.
Terminating the life of a child is a horror,
by knife, by needle, by gun, by suffocation.
It's the very painful termination of a life.
Forcing a mob of impressionable high schoolers to tromp around in the cold is not going to accomplish anything. It's bordering on child abuse.
Anonymous wrote:
A Child is a Child is a Child....
no matter what stage of development.
My rights STOP where yours BEGIN....
no matter your age or stage of development.
If the father is obligated to support that child,
why shouldn't the mother at least refrain from
commiting the violent act of ending that child's life?
Whatever you want to call "it" makes no difference
to the child who IS a dependent life, as any minor child is.
Terminating the life of a child is a horror,
by knife, by needle, by gun, by suffocation.
It's the very painful termination of a life.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
A Child is a Child is a Child....
no matter what stage of development.
My rights STOP where yours BEGIN....
no matter your age or stage of development.
If the father is obligated to support that child,
why shouldn't the mother at least refrain from
commiting the violent act of ending that child's life?
Whatever you want to call "it" makes no difference
to the child who IS a dependent life, as any minor child is.
Terminating the life of a child is a horror,
by knife, by needle, by gun, by suffocation.
It's the very painful termination of a life.
No, MY rights over my body supersede anything and anyone else.
What about the rights of your child?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
A Child is a Child is a Child....
no matter what stage of development.
My rights STOP where yours BEGIN....
no matter your age or stage of development.
If the father is obligated to support that child,
why shouldn't the mother at least refrain from
commiting the violent act of ending that child's life?
Whatever you want to call "it" makes no difference
to the child who IS a dependent life, as any minor child is.
Terminating the life of a child is a horror,
by knife, by needle, by gun, by suffocation.
It's the very painful termination of a life.
No, MY rights over my body supersede anything and anyone else.
Anonymous wrote:YOU never had any rights over MY body, no matter your age or stage of development.
Anonymous wrote:
A Child is a Child is a Child....
no matter what stage of development.
My rights STOP where yours BEGIN....
no matter your age or stage of development.
If the father is obligated to support that child,
why shouldn't the mother at least refrain from
commiting the violent act of ending that child's life?
Whatever you want to call "it" makes no difference
to the child who IS a dependent life, as any minor child is.
Terminating the life of a child is a horror,
by knife, by needle, by gun, by suffocation.
It's the very painful termination of a life.
Anonymous wrote:Um, this Friday is January, not March.
But I agree with you that the rights of the fetus stop where the rights of the woman begin.