Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Jockeys have had minimum weights since forever. No outrage.
Why do people like you not understand the difference between a standard imposed by private industry/organizations versus government laws?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I've always been naturally very thin (and tall) so this amuses me. I wonder what BMI they have set. Hopefully something reasonable like 17%.
Are you being purposely obtuse?
17% BMI is at the low/normal range. Anorexia is another story, genius.
Let me share a visual so that you can "get" the point.
Anonymous wrote:I've always been naturally very thin (and tall) so this amuses me. I wonder what BMI they have set. Hopefully something reasonable like 17%.

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Jockeys have had minimum weights since forever. No outrage.
Why do people like you not understand the difference between a standard imposed by private industry/organizations versus government laws?
Do you understand the term "occupational safety"?
BTW jockeys weights are set by the state racing commission, i.e. government.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Jockeys have had minimum weights since forever. No outrage.
Why do people like you not understand the difference between a standard imposed by private industry/organizations versus government laws?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Jockeys have had minimum weights since forever. No outrage.
Why do people like you not understand the difference between a standard imposed by private industry/organizations versus government laws?
Anonymous wrote:Jockeys have had minimum weights since forever. No outrage.
Anonymous wrote:This has happened before, when models have died from eating disorders.
And um, people who ARE excessively fat ARE banned from modeling. Or they're told to go to the fat modeling agency.