Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I thought that the Post shouldn't have published it and I'm a liberal.
+1
I am also a liberal and it really is quite pathetic when anyone justifies the sort of thing the WP did. To WP's credit they removed the cartoon as soon as it surfaced as an issue. The cartoonist trying to defend her actions was ludicrous.
+2. That was a really, really tasteless cartoon. I am very surprised it was published.
jsteele wrote:Because I am a PC liberal, I think that children of politicians should be off limits. Therefore, I though this cartoon was in bad taste and was pleased that the Post removed it. However, I am surprised that the "It's time to stop being PC" crowd is bothered by it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I thought that the Post shouldn't have published it and I'm a liberal.
+1
I am also a liberal and it really is quite pathetic when anyone justifies the sort of thing the WP did. To WP's credit they removed the cartoon as soon as it surfaced as an issue. The cartoonist trying to defend her actions was ludicrous.
Anonymous wrote:I thought that the Post shouldn't have published it and I'm a liberal.
Anonymous wrote:http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/ted-cruz-blasts-washington-post-cartoon-daughters-monkeys-n484901
First, the cartoon was making fun of you for treating your family like props. The cartoon does not ridicule your daughters.
Second, if you don't want your family to be discussed/depicted in the news, stop using them like props in your campaign. If you make them campaign for you, then you can't complain when they are a topic of discussion.
DUMB.ASS.