Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ancient historian here (though this was not my period). There is no reference to him during his lifetime. However, there are some references within a few decades of his death, such that most historians brlieve that there was a preacher of that name at that time. Beyond that, there is little than can be definitively stated about the historical figure.
Sure, but, isn't it safe to infer, not only for the admitedly scant records but mainly for the complete devotion of the people who actually knew him (or, if you will, claimed to have known him) -- and were willing to be cruficied, stoned to death, etc on his name --, that he existed?
"Hey guys, let's make up the existence of this guy. We'll be willing to suffer horrible torture and death on this fake guy's name."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm not Christian either, but I don't think there is a single piece of evidence that he ever even existed. The earliest mentions of Jesus are about 200 years after his alleged death.
Personally, I think he probably existed as a small cult leader. After his death, his legacy grew and eventually, the Roman empire adopted Christianity as a way of unifying the people.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_Jesus
Yeah, if you don't actually know something, you should not really respond. Because you are incorrect. There is a LOT of documented evidence of Jesus' existence, discussed at length in many, many, many books. Pretty much no one doubts his existence.
Please list the books. The Bible doesn't count as one of them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm not Christian either, but I don't think there is a single piece of evidence that he ever even existed. The earliest mentions of Jesus are about 200 years after his alleged death.
Personally, I think he probably existed as a small cult leader. After his death, his legacy grew and eventually, the Roman empire adopted Christianity as a way of unifying the people.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_Jesus
Yeah, if you don't actually know something, you should not really respond. Because you are incorrect. There is a LOT of documented evidence of Jesus' existence, discussed at length in many, many, many books. Pretty much no one doubts his existence.
Anonymous wrote:Ancient historian here (though this was not my period). There is no reference to him during his lifetime. However, there are some references within a few decades of his death, such that most historians brlieve that there was a preacher of that name at that time. Beyond that, there is little than can be definitively stated about the historical figure.
Anonymous wrote:My understanding and I am not religious, is he did actually exist. Now, the bigger question for me is did he really have these visions or did he have a mental illness?
Anonymous wrote:My understanding and I am not religious, is he did actually exist. Now, the bigger question for me is did he really have these visions or did he have a mental illness?
Anonymous wrote:I'm not Christian either, but I don't think there is a single piece of evidence that he ever even existed. The earliest mentions of Jesus are about 200 years after his alleged death.
Personally, I think he probably existed as a small cult leader. After his death, his legacy grew and eventually, the Roman empire adopted Christianity as a way of unifying the people.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_Jesus