Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I clicked on this thinking it was going to be about how the Sanders campaign accessed confidential data from the Clinton campaign and tried to blame it on the DNC and the software vendor. The DNC won't allow Bernie to access the data again until they explain why they accessed another campaign's confidential data and who was involved. They also have to demonstrate that they didn't download and keep any data. The campaign fired their digital director but four accounts were used to access the Clinton data.
I thought that's what it was about too, but honestly it feels like a ploy to discredit Sanders because he scares them.
It's all a conspiracy. When Bernie says he won't run negative ads but then runs negative ads, it's a conspiracy. When Bernie says he won't accept super pac support but does accept super pac support, it's a conspiracy. When Bernie's campaign violates voters' privacy by accessing confidential data with four different user accounts, it's a conspiracy.
No you're right. I didn't mean to make it sound like he's some victim of the HRC machine. I don't think he is. He's a politician, just like she is.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bernie's not going to win, bro.
I dont think he will. Yes, I despise Clinton and I am not a Bernie fan boy. I would prefer he scare her a bit and the party is doing their best to prevent that. Thats what I find annoying.
I believe he would scare the hell out of her if there were more debates or debates during times people actually watch. Scare her in a few primaries and eventually get blown out is how I imagine it would play out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bernie's not going to win, bro.
I dont think he will. Yes, I despise Clinton and I am not a Bernie fan boy. I would prefer he scare her a bit and the party is doing their best to prevent that. Thats what I find annoying.
I believe he would scare the hell out of her if there were more debates or debates during times people actually watch. Scare her in a few primaries and eventually get blown out is how I imagine it would play out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I clicked on this thinking it was going to be about how the Sanders campaign accessed confidential data from the Clinton campaign and tried to blame it on the DNC and the software vendor. The DNC won't allow Bernie to access the data again until they explain why they accessed another campaign's confidential data and who was involved. They also have to demonstrate that they didn't download and keep any data. The campaign fired their digital director but four accounts were used to access the Clinton data.
I thought that's what it was about too, but honestly it feels like a ploy to discredit Sanders because he scares them.
It's all a conspiracy. When Bernie says he won't run negative ads but then runs negative ads, it's a conspiracy. When Bernie says he won't accept super pac support but does accept super pac support, it's a conspiracy. When Bernie's campaign violates voters' privacy by accessing confidential data with four different user accounts, it's a conspiracy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I clicked on this thinking it was going to be about how the Sanders campaign accessed confidential data from the Clinton campaign and tried to blame it on the DNC and the software vendor. The DNC won't allow Bernie to access the data again until they explain why they accessed another campaign's confidential data and who was involved. They also have to demonstrate that they didn't download and keep any data. The campaign fired their digital director but four accounts were used to access the Clinton data.
I thought that's what it was about too, but honestly it feels like a ploy to discredit Sanders because he scares them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bernie's not going to win, bro.
I dont think he will. Yes, I despise Clinton and I am not a Bernie fan boy. I would prefer he scare her a bit and the party is doing their best to prevent that. Thats what I find annoying.
I believe he would scare the hell out of her if there were more debates or debates during times people actually watch. Scare her in a few primaries and eventually get blown out is how I imagine it would play out.
Anonymous wrote:Anyone aware that the dems have a debate tomorrow night?
DWS is a fraud. To bury these debates to maximize little viewership and interest is absurd. This is some stupid version of saving your "best" player for the playoffs by protecting her from prime time and possibly looking silly.
Dems dont need to have 900 debates like the GOP. At least have them on during the week so people can watch and see what the party offers thats different than the other side.
If this nonsense was done in 2008, Obama probably would have never gotten the nomination since nobody would see him perform in debates. Much like Bernie, all the momentum Obama would have built would have died by the lack of debates and do nothing by the DNC.
Shameful.
Anonymous wrote:I clicked on this thinking it was going to be about how the Sanders campaign accessed confidential data from the Clinton campaign and tried to blame it on the DNC and the software vendor. The DNC won't allow Bernie to access the data again until they explain why they accessed another campaign's confidential data and who was involved. They also have to demonstrate that they didn't download and keep any data. The campaign fired their digital director but four accounts were used to access the Clinton data.
Anonymous wrote:I clicked on this thinking it was going to be about how the Sanders campaign accessed confidential data from the Clinton campaign and tried to blame it on the DNC and the software vendor. The DNC won't allow Bernie to access the data again until they explain why they accessed another campaign's confidential data and who was involved. They also have to demonstrate that they didn't download and keep any data. The campaign fired their digital director but four accounts were used to access the Clinton data.
Anonymous wrote:Bernie's not going to win, bro.