Anonymous wrote:OP here. Thanks for the responses. It seems like direct communication with the brother/son just isn't happening in many cases.
For those who have tried with no success, I truly feel bad for you!
Anonymous wrote:I blame my son for any and all animosity my DIL has shown me. Now I no longer speak to him. He's pussy whipped.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This isn't a phenomenon limited to MILs/SILs and the wife, this is a pretty universal phenomenon of people displacing blame onto people who can't hurt them as much. Kind of like how when someone learns their spouse has had an affair, they often disproportionately blame the other partner while forgiving their spouse. It's much easier emotionally to blame the outsider for having ruined a lovely family dynamic than to admit the person you love dearly (your child) just isn't that interested in a relationship with you, and that lovely family dynamic never existed.
You clearly don't understand affairs.
My last sentence was intended to address OP's particular question, not the affair scenario. For that one, I would have framed it differently -- that for many people it is easier to blame the outside party than to confront some of the realities of what an affair says about your spouse and your marriage. Beyond that potential misunderstanding, I'm curious to know what you think I don't understand about affairs.
Anonymous wrote:
My mother understood it this way: When she was growing up, it was the woman's responsibility to manage the family. What invariably happened was that they (DIL's, DD's) would always be sure to include their own bio families in "family events," but one was never sure about the IL family. Since it was HER responsibility, if one was snubbed one knew where to place the blame.
My DB's wife is just a bitch so I don't have to think much of it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This isn't a phenomenon limited to MILs/SILs and the wife, this is a pretty universal phenomenon of people displacing blame onto people who can't hurt them as much. Kind of like how when someone learns their spouse has had an affair, they often disproportionately blame the other partner while forgiving their spouse. It's much easier emotionally to blame the outsider for having ruined a lovely family dynamic than to admit the person you love dearly (your child) just isn't that interested in a relationship with you, and that lovely family dynamic never existed.
You clearly don't understand affairs.
Anonymous wrote:This isn't a phenomenon limited to MILs/SILs and the wife, this is a pretty universal phenomenon of people displacing blame onto people who can't hurt them as much. Kind of like how when someone learns their spouse has had an affair, they often disproportionately blame the other partner while forgiving their spouse. It's much easier emotionally to blame the outsider for having ruined a lovely family dynamic than to admit the person you love dearly (your child) just isn't that interested in a relationship with you, and that lovely family dynamic never existed.
Anonymous wrote:I've seen several comments/threads where MILs and SILs blame the son's/brother's wife for family relationship/communication issues, such as:
-Lack of phone calls/contact
-Infrequent visits
-not being invited to kid milestone events like recitals and graduations
-Perceptions--real or imagined--that the wife's family gets "more of everything" than the husband's family.
My question is--isn't this anger/frustration/disappointment misplaced? Why are you not more upset with your son/brother? Why is it expected that the wife should do more for her husband's family, when she likely has her own family contacts to manage and plan?