Anonymous
Post 11/29/2015 22:06     Subject: Re:Oh no! Not Stella McCartney too....
Donatella Versace??!!
Anonymous
Post 11/29/2015 19:13     Subject: Oh no! Not Stella McCartney too....
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I always thought she was the very low end of "attractive" and should never have too much of a close up.

So for her, I'd say GO FOR IT. Any surgery is bound to be a huge improvement on what nature gave her.



People like you annoy me. Not everyone is a supermodel. Not every woman needs to be drop dead gorgeous. Personally, I like Stella McCartney's looks. She is fine the way she was. I am sad she messed up her face. There was nothing wrong with it.


I agree with you. But she works in the FASHION industry. Its all about looks. Appearance is their chosen benchmark.

Uh, what? She's a designer, not a model.


Name other pig ugly designers. I can't think of any.
Anonymous
Post 11/28/2015 22:18     Subject: Oh no! Not Stella McCartney too....
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I always thought she was the very low end of "attractive" and should never have too much of a close up.

So for her, I'd say GO FOR IT. Any surgery is bound to be a huge improvement on what nature gave her.



People like you annoy me. Not everyone is a supermodel. Not every woman needs to be drop dead gorgeous. Personally, I like Stella McCartney's looks. She is fine the way she was. I am sad she messed up her face. There was nothing wrong with it.


I agree with you. But she works in the FASHION industry. Its all about looks. Appearance is their chosen benchmark.

Uh, what? She's a designer, not a model.
Anonymous
Post 11/28/2015 20:56     Subject: Re:Oh no! Not Stella McCartney too....
This first picture is definitely just a bad picture. If you look at the other pictures from that night she looks wonderful. That said, yes, she's definitely had either fillers and Botox.
Anonymous
Post 11/28/2015 20:44     Subject: Oh no! Not Stella McCartney too....
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I always thought she was the very low end of "attractive" and should never have too much of a close up.

So for her, I'd say GO FOR IT. Any surgery is bound to be a huge improvement on what nature gave her.



People like you annoy me. Not everyone is a supermodel. Not every woman needs to be drop dead gorgeous. Personally, I like Stella McCartney's looks. She is fine the way she was. I am sad she messed up her face. There was nothing wrong with it.


I agree with you. But she works in the FASHION industry. Its all about looks. Appearance is their chosen benchmark.

I disagree with you. Fashion industry is all about being skinny. As long at you're not butt ugly and you're not modeling, you're ok.
Anonymous
Post 11/28/2015 20:15     Subject: Oh no! Not Stella McCartney too....
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I always thought she was the very low end of "attractive" and should never have too much of a close up.

So for her, I'd say GO FOR IT. Any surgery is bound to be a huge improvement on what nature gave her.



People like you annoy me. Not everyone is a supermodel. Not every woman needs to be drop dead gorgeous. Personally, I like Stella McCartney's looks. She is fine the way she was. I am sad she messed up her face. There was nothing wrong with it.


I agree with you. But she works in the FASHION industry. Its all about looks. Appearance is their chosen benchmark.
Anonymous
Post 11/28/2015 17:35     Subject: Oh no! Not Stella McCartney too....
Anonymous wrote:I always thought she was the very low end of "attractive" and should never have too much of a close up.

So for her, I'd say GO FOR IT. Any surgery is bound to be a huge improvement on what nature gave her.



People like you annoy me. Not everyone is a supermodel. Not every woman needs to be drop dead gorgeous. Personally, I like Stella McCartney's looks. She is fine the way she was. I am sad she messed up her face. There was nothing wrong with it.
Anonymous
Post 11/27/2015 17:06     Subject: Oh no! Not Stella McCartney too....
I always thought she was the very low end of "attractive" and should never have too much of a close up.

So for her, I'd say GO FOR IT. Any surgery is bound to be a huge improvement on what nature gave her.
Anonymous
Post 11/27/2015 16:40     Subject: Oh no! Not Stella McCartney too....
Anonymous wrote:I'm confused. If you scroll down, is that another photo of her from the same night? That's what the caption suggests, but she looks totally different, IOW, normal. Was is makeup and lighting?


Yea looks like the first photo was just a bad photo
Anonymous
Post 11/27/2015 14:13     Subject: Oh no! Not Stella McCartney too....
I'm confused. If you scroll down, is that another photo of her from the same night? That's what the caption suggests, but she looks totally different, IOW, normal. Was is makeup and lighting?
Anonymous
Post 11/26/2015 23:49     Subject: Oh no! Not Stella McCartney too....
Sad. I thought he had her mind together.
Anonymous
Post 11/26/2015 23:48     Subject: Oh no! Not Stella McCartney too....
She looks like Lindsay Lohan
Anonymous
Post 11/26/2015 23:27     Subject: Oh no! Not Stella McCartney too....
Unrecognizable
Anonymous
Post 11/26/2015 23:27     Subject: Oh no! Not Stella McCartney too....
Ugh, the reference to Chuckie's sister is spot on, tragically.
Anonymous
Post 11/26/2015 23:21     Subject: Oh no! Not Stella McCartney too....
Another perfectly attractive woman messes up her face:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3335836/SEBASTIAN-SHAKESPEARE-happened-Stella-s-face.html