Anonymous wrote:It's a shame that micromanagers aren't coached to improve and trust. Not sure why their idiosyncrasies are tolerated. They are the problem.
In some situations, I have worked with subpar employees that have required micromanagement. It was not my favorite thing and in an ideal world, they would have been let go. Typically, I prefer that my team work at their own pace and bring their issues to me (with a proposed solution, if they have one). I don't always get to choose my employees, I inherited some and do the best with what I have. My deliverables are still the same. It would honestly take me much less time to do it myself, rather than micromanage a poor performer, but I choose to let the poor performer know that they need to improve and work with them on how to do so.