Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kids didn't react because they never took the WISC. There innate intelligence was fairly obvious from any old test teachers wanted to give them. I feel sorry for all the kids who are subjected to these additional batteries of testing.
*their*
These are the DCUM responses I HATE THE MOST-- the ones that in no way, shape or form answer the question asked, but instead point out that they are #blessed not to have the problem-- with a healthy dose of smug judgment thrown in. PP: when you read the question and realized you had nothing substantive to add, why did you not STFU and keep moving? Does your response do anything except give you a chance to congratulate yourself? --signed a mom whose child also qualified for AAP based on his dazzlingly obvious brilliance () , but still had to "subject him to batteries of tests" for ADHD.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kids didn't react because they never took the WISC. There innate intelligence was fairly obvious from any old test teachers wanted to give them. I feel sorry for all the kids who are subjected to these additional batteries of testing.
*their*
) , but still had to "subject him to batteries of tests" for ADHD. Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kids didn't react because they never took the WISC. There innate intelligence was fairly obvious from any old test teachers wanted to give them. I feel sorry for all the kids who are subjected to these additional batteries of testing.
*their*
"Batteries of testing?" It isn't as if they are poked and prodded with spinal taps, MRIs, CAT scans, blood tests, etc. I guess what you're trying to say so inartfully is, "I'm SO glad my kids were obviously smart to those with whom they interacted. SO sorry yours is not."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kids didn't react because they never took the WISC. There innate intelligence was fairly obvious from any old test teachers wanted to give them. I feel sorry for all the kids who are subjected to these additional batteries of testing.
*their*
I worry about GBRS. My son is smart but quiet. I'm not sure the teacher even knows he's in the classroom let alone that he should be in AAP. Pretty sure his GBRS will be low.
Anonymous wrote:My kids didn't react because they never took the WISC. There innate intelligence was fairly obvious from any old test teachers wanted to give them. I feel sorry for all the kids who are subjected to these additional batteries of testing.
Anonymous wrote:We told our DS that he was getting to go to college and take a puzzle test for an afternoon. We also told him that it was important that he do his best but mostly it was to have fun.
After the test, he was energized and wanted to do more of the fun tests. We took him for ice cream.
The results came back a week or so later. He did just fine.
BTW, for what it is worth, GBRS is total nonsense and causes most of the confusion. We have three kids:
Kid 1) Seriously smart. In 2nd grade he could multiply 2 digit numbers in his head, also could calculate exponents and square roots in his head. Could spell any word. GBRS 9 - In on appeal after he smoked the WISC.
Kid 2) Solid Above Average. Not special, just bright. In, no appeal GBRS 9.
Kid 3) Averagely Average, but very sweet. No need for AAP, didn't test in, teacher and AART all but begged us to parent refer. We did, he got in with a 16 GBRS. Huh???
The first 2 are happy in AAP. The 3rd is happy in base school!
Anonymous wrote:^^ kids were 8 (AAP) and 12 (ADHD testing)