Anonymous wrote:Doesn't everyone have wifi in their homes? How is this different? (real question)
Anonymous wrote:Hey crazy wireless lady! Welcome back! Finished wrapping your money in foil?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bunch of nuts that don't know diddly about science or research.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1849947/
Bunch of nut teachers that don't know diddly about science or research.
Wireless radiation is emitted by the myriad of wireless devices we encounter every day. It was once thought to be relatively harmless. However, we now know that wireless radiation can cause non-thermal biological effects as well, including damage to cells and DNA, even at low levels.
Reducing Your Exposure to Wireless Radiation
Some tips to reduce your exposure to wireless radiation.
What You Need to Know About Wireless Radiation and Your Baby
Taking certain precautions around wireless radiation is appropriate for our most vulnerable populations, including pregnant women.
http://www.uft.org/our-rights/wireless-radiation
INSANE = NEA
More crazy teachers
Resolution-
The National Education Association believes that all educational facilities must have healthy indoor
air quality, be smoke
-
free,
be safe from
environmental and chemical hazards
, and
be safe
from hazardous
electromagnetic fields
.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bunch of nuts that don't know diddly about science or research.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1849947/
Bunch of nut teachers that don't know diddly about science or research.
Wireless radiation is emitted by the myriad of wireless devices we encounter every day. It was once thought to be relatively harmless. However, we now know that wireless radiation can cause non-thermal biological effects as well, including damage to cells and DNA, even at low levels.
Reducing Your Exposure to Wireless Radiation
Some tips to reduce your exposure to wireless radiation.
What You Need to Know About Wireless Radiation and Your Baby
Taking certain precautions around wireless radiation is appropriate for our most vulnerable populations, including pregnant women.
http://www.uft.org/our-rights/wireless-radiation
Anonymous wrote:Bunch of nuts that don't know diddly about science or research.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1849947/
Anonymous wrote:this sounds like a bunch of hysterical nonsense and I don't think OP is a disinterested observer.
Anonymous wrote:What is the consensus? Is wireless internet safe for kids? Is this a non-issue?
I saw a sign posted by Safe Tech for Schools and they do seem to make some good points.
http://safetechforschoolsmaryland.blogspot.com/2015/02/bells-mills-radiation-levels-in.html
And, there's a meeting on October 20th at Bells Mill about this. Anyone involved in this?