Anonymous wrote:
6 of the 8 2nd grade boys my husband coaches are in the same 2nd grade this year. It is really sweet. They are a tight knit bunch. Our school only has recess 1 grade at a time. There isn't a lot of mixing with kids in other grades. These kids attend the same bday parties, etc. It really forms a tight knit group---even after they get older and some concentrate on a different sport that initial bond with the early classmates/teammates is still there. My 5th grader has been doing travel since 3rd grade and has made friends from many different schools--but most parties are still the old classroom/first sports team buddies. I am one of those that feels Rec should run independently. Kids choosing to stay in Rec, for the most part, will not have any interest in DA, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can you help me to understand what the benefit to doing this is? My child is only currently a U8, and I'm not knowledgeable about soccer.[/quote]
We think it's how soccer is set up in the rest of the world. That's not quite true, but it hasn't stopped anyone.
It IS how the major international tournaments are set up. Somehow, we've managed to find a bunch of kids born in January through March for the current U.S. U17 team without changing every team in the USA.
In any case -- there's some solid pushback at the younger age groups, and I can tell you rec leagues will have a lot of leeway in how they set things up.
There is a long discussion of this topic over in the travel soccer in NoVa thread (much of it overwrought in my view, but there is some good information there). I think the impetus was not so much to blindly copy what the countries who are good at soccer development do, but to make the path into elite soccer smoother. The change will be beneficial not only for international tournaments, but also for evaluating kids who are candidates to play on a Development Academy team. DAs are now the primary feeder system for the youth national teams, and they have always been birth year. Starting next year or the year after, the program will expand to cover U12s (currently U14 is the youngest age group). Evaluating kids will be simpler if they are already on birth year teams.
Many people feel that the change will cause all sorts of problems at the rec level. I don't share that view. As an earlier poster said, it just means that your child will end up with some extra friends in addition to the ones they have from their grade at school. The current age group classifications are pretty bizarre if you think about it. Most school cut offs around here are Sept. 1, but soccer age groups are August 1-July 31. Other parts of the country have different school cutoffs. The calendar year approach seems more sensible to me.
6 of the 8 2nd grade boys my husband coaches are in the same 2nd grade this year. It is really sweet. They are a tight knit bunch. Our school only has recess 1 grade at a time. There isn't a lot of mixing with kids in other grades. These kids attend the same bday parties, etc. It really forms a tight knit group---even after they get older and some concentrate on a different sport that initial bond with the early classmates/teammates is still there. My 5th grader has been doing travel since 3rd grade and has made friends from many different schools--but most parties are still the old classroom/first sports team buddies. I am one of those that feels Rec should run independently. Kids choosing to stay in Rec, for the most part, will not have any interest in DA, etc.
at a neighborhood school---it is usually how many become friends with their neighbors that live 4 streets over, etc. A lot of Kindergartners are timid enough to be starting school, new sport, etc...throw them in with First graders that already have 2 seasons of Rec under their belt and it's not a great mix for them---especially because are K teams are co-ed to begin with. Many girls drop out because of the boys in K soccer....
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can you help me to understand what the benefit to doing this is? My child is only currently a U8, and I'm not knowledgeable about soccer.[/quote]
We think it's how soccer is set up in the rest of the world. That's not quite true, but it hasn't stopped anyone.
It IS how the major international tournaments are set up. Somehow, we've managed to find a bunch of kids born in January through March for the current U.S. U17 team without changing every team in the USA.
In any case -- there's some solid pushback at the younger age groups, and I can tell you rec leagues will have a lot of leeway in how they set things up.
There is a long discussion of this topic over in the travel soccer in NoVa thread (much of it overwrought in my view, but there is some good information there). I think the impetus was not so much to blindly copy what the countries who are good at soccer development do, but to make the path into elite soccer smoother. The change will be beneficial not only for international tournaments, but also for evaluating kids who are candidates to play on a Development Academy team. DAs are now the primary feeder system for the youth national teams, and they have always been birth year. Starting next year or the year after, the program will expand to cover U12s (currently U14 is the youngest age group). Evaluating kids will be simpler if they are already on birth year teams.
Many people feel that the change will cause all sorts of problems at the rec level. I don't share that view. As an earlier poster said, it just means that your child will end up with some extra friends in addition to the ones they have from their grade at school. The current age group classifications are pretty bizarre if you think about it. Most school cut offs around here are Sept. 1, but soccer age groups are August 1-July 31. Other parts of the country have different school cutoffs. The calendar year approach seems more sensible to me.
6 of the 8 2nd grade boys my husband coaches are in the same 2nd grade this year. It is really sweet. They are a tight knit bunch. Our school only has recess 1 grade at a time. There isn't a lot of mixing with kids in other grades. These kids attend the same bday parties, etc. It really forms a tight knit group---even after they get older and some concentrate on a different sport that initial bond with the early classmates/teammates is still there. My 5th grader has been doing travel since 3rd grade and has made friends from many different schools--but most parties are still the old classroom/first sports team buddies. I am one of those that feels Rec should run independently. Kids choosing to stay in Rec, for the most part, will not have any interest in DA, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can you help me to understand what the benefit to doing this is? My child is only currently a U8, and I'm not knowledgeable about soccer.[/quote]
We think it's how soccer is set up in the rest of the world. That's not quite true, but it hasn't stopped anyone.
It IS how the major international tournaments are set up. Somehow, we've managed to find a bunch of kids born in January through March for the current U.S. U17 team without changing every team in the USA.
In any case -- there's some solid pushback at the younger age groups, and I can tell you rec leagues will have a lot of leeway in how they set things up.
There is a long discussion of this topic over in the travel soccer in NoVa thread (much of it overwrought in my view, but there is some good information there). I think the impetus was not so much to blindly copy what the countries who are good at soccer development do, but to make the path into elite soccer smoother. The change will be beneficial not only for international tournaments, but also for evaluating kids who are candidates to play on a Development Academy team. DAs are now the primary feeder system for the youth national teams, and they have always been birth year. Starting next year or the year after, the program will expand to cover U12s (currently U14 is the youngest age group). Evaluating kids will be simpler if they are already on birth year teams.
Many people feel that the change will cause all sorts of problems at the rec level. I don't share that view. As an earlier poster said, it just means that your child will end up with some extra friends in addition to the ones they have from their grade at school. The current age group classifications are pretty bizarre if you think about it. Most school cut offs around here are Sept. 1, but soccer age groups are August 1-July 31. Other parts of the country have different school cutoffs. The calendar year approach seems more sensible to me.
Anonymous wrote:Can you help me to understand what the benefit to doing this is? My child is only currently a U8, and I'm not knowledgeable about soccer.
Anonymous wrote:Thank you, PP -- that is a helpful summary/description. I am wondering how our club will deal with the elite teams. I am thinking of one team in particular that has developed strong chemistry, is highly successful and is divided about half and half between fall birthdays and the Jan-July birthdays. The club could keep the team together but only if several players play up. I guess this would have a domino effect on other teams in the club and arguably the team could lose some of its edge in competition against other teams? It seems that some internal politics within clubs/among coaches could come into play in these decisions....
Anonymous wrote:The age cut off for all us soccer leagues will be January 1. There will be no more "u9" or "u11" Teams will be referred to as 2005 etc. . . based on the year kids were born.
Initially there will be a fair amount of restructuring for teams. Yes some teams/clubs will say "we will just play you up", but that does not help kids who will then be among the youngest on the team versus being among the oldest on the team. It is never a good idea to play up unless your kid really is just eating up the competition at this age level, and you cannot move him/her to a higher level of play at that same age.
US Soccer will NOT grandfather in kids already playing. State organizations under the US Soccer umbrella are making the call whether to (a) convert everyone starting with next summer's tryouts; (b) convert everyone in the summer of 2017; or (c) allow local leagues to decide for themselves whether to convert this coming summer or next. It seems like most states as saying -- convert this summer. That, in turn, will affect how big tournaments are handled as teams will likely need to be set up to comply with the Jan 1 age cutoff.
Again -- DO NOT have your kid play up simply because it is easier for a club, or to "stay together". Your kid will make friends playing on their appropriate age team.