Anonymous wrote:NP. I have to laugh when people bust out the argument: if you don't like it, leave. Really? Those are the only options people have? Actually, I'm pretty sure we all complain about things from time to time when we want them to be better. DCUM is no exception.

Did you really think your whiny little post was going to further your cause? It didn't. Do better.

You figured it out, OP- Jeff has a secret, long harbored grudge against cyclists. This entire website has been a front. He has just been waiting for the moment for people to bash cyclists so he could delete any pro-cyclist posts and force all the poor cyclists to mean bashing and jibes.

It's a conspiracy, and you saw through it all! Gold star for you!

I posted an anti-cyclist rant once and Jeff deleted it, so I think it is fair to say he is anti-rant and not anti-cyclist b

Anonymous wrote:Sycophants.

No, I have called Jeff out before.

But you, my friend, are a whiny baby seemingly obsessed with your sad little deleted posts.

Get a grip.

NP. I have to laugh when people bust out the argument: if you don't like it, leave. Really? Those are the only options people have? Actually, I'm pretty sure we all complain about things from time to time when we want them to be better. DCUM is no exception.

Sycophants.

It always cracks me up when people complain about Jeff deleting something. No one is forcing you to come to this site, use this site, post on this site, etc. If being on this site means so much to you, play by the rules. Hey, I just told my 6 year old that same thing.... Interesting. Get a life OP.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love how responding in kind to a hateful, incoherent anti-cyclist ranter gets deleted while the increasingly ugly piling-on gets a pass. Real even-handed of you, Jeff.

Really, if you have to be nasty to anonymous posters AND then again to the guy who runs the site, really its time for you to quit or take a long, hard look at yourself. What would your mother think of your bad behavior? Maybe that's a good starting point.

x2. What a loser

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love how responding in kind to a hateful, incoherent anti-cyclist ranter gets deleted while the increasingly ugly piling-on gets a pass. Real even-handed of you, Jeff.

Really, if you have to be nasty to anonymous posters AND then again to the guy who runs the site, really its time for you to quit or take a long, hard look at yourself. What would your mother think of your bad behavior? Maybe that's a good starting point.

Nothing is anonymous to Jeff

Anonymous wrote:I love how responding in kind to a hateful, incoherent anti-cyclist ranter gets deleted while the increasingly ugly piling-on gets a pass. Real even-handed of you, Jeff.

Really, if you have to be nasty to anonymous posters AND then again to the guy who runs the site, really its time for you to quit or take a long, hard look at yourself. What would your mother think of your bad behavior? Maybe that's a good starting point.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:If I understand correctly, you are complaining that your hateful, incoherent post got deleted? BTW, you left out "f-bomb laden". But, yeah, it got deleted.

Intentionally hateful, incoherent post, in response to same.

As for the cussing, if you were actually, you know, consistent on that point I might have a little more respect for your decision. Maybe you should invest in a censorbot if you can't keep up.

It doesn't really matter if you respect his decision though.

Using that logic, I suppose the forum feedback page should just be closed.

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:If I understand correctly, you are complaining that your hateful, incoherent post got deleted? BTW, you left out "f-bomb laden". But, yeah, it got deleted.

Intentionally hateful, incoherent post, in response to same.

As for the cussing, if you were actually, you know, consistent on that point I might have a little more respect for your decision. Maybe you should invest in a censorbot if you can't keep up.

It doesn't really matter if you respect his decision though.

jsteele wrote:If I understand correctly, you are complaining that your hateful, incoherent post got deleted? BTW, you left out "f-bomb laden". But, yeah, it got deleted.

Intentionally hateful, incoherent post, in response to same.

As for the cussing, if you were actually, you know, consistent on that point I might have a little more respect for your decision. Maybe you should invest in a censorbot if you can't keep up.

If I understand correctly, you are complaining that your hateful, incoherent post got deleted? BTW, you left out "f-bomb laden". But, yeah, it got deleted.

I love how responding in kind to a hateful, incoherent anti-cyclist ranter gets deleted while the increasingly ugly piling-on gets a pass. Real even-handed of you, Jeff.