Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder what the tipping point will be -- 20%? 25% 30%? -- when the IB increases really start to move and in boundary families feel more comfortable with Hardy. Hope it happens in the next few years when my DC will be done at Key.
+1
same here
Anonymous wrote:I have actual knowledge on this issue.
The current 7th graders (last year's 6th graders) are around mid-20's IB percentage. The "Feeder School plus Brent" percentage is considerably higher. (The latter is the number people should care about; the former is for the harpies.)
The tipping point will be next year, not this year. The school will go from 15% IB to about 20% IB this year. (Low-end estimate is 19%.)
Next year's 6th grade class will be a lot more IB. The school overall will be around 25% and the 6th grade, in particular, will be around 35-45%. The school will be more than half "Feeder plus Brent."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A new year, a new thread.
The 2013-14 number was 13%
The 2014-15 number was 15%
The 2014-15 number wasn't released until April 14 this year. So you have seven and a half months to speculate, and argue why your guess is in fact the correct number. Or argue that the official DCPS numbers are wrong. Or argue that they're meaningless.
Is this 15% of all IB population? IF so, this is hardly a surprise and typical for much of upper crust DC, sending their kids to WIS, Sidwell, GDS etc. that are right in the neighborhood.
If it's 15% of overall school population comes form IB, then that's another issue and a little concerning. Even my rising EOTP has 35% IB students, though most have bailed for charters or WOTP.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder what the tipping point will be -- 20%? 25% 30%? -- when the IB increases really start to move and in boundary families feel more comfortable with Hardy. Hope it happens in the next few years when my DC will be done at Key.
+1
Anonymous wrote:I wonder what the tipping point will be -- 20%? 25% 30%? -- when the IB increases really start to move and in boundary families feel more comfortable with Hardy. Hope it happens in the next few years when my DC will be done at Key.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A new year, a new thread.
The 2013-14 number was 13%
The 2014-15 number was 15%
The 2014-15 number wasn't released until April 14 this year. So you have seven and a half months to speculate, and argue why your guess is in fact the correct number. Or argue that the official DCPS numbers are wrong. Or argue that they're meaningless.
Is this 15% of all IB population? IF so, this is hardly a surprise and typical for much of upper crust DC, sending their kids to WIS, Sidwell, GDS etc. that are right in the neighborhood.
If it's 15% of overall school population comes form IB, then that's another issue and a little concerning. Even my rising EOTP has 35% IB students, though most have bailed for charters or WOTP.
Not typical of Janney population.
Hardy catchment is wealthier.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A new year, a new thread.
The 2013-14 number was 13%
The 2014-15 number was 15%
The 2014-15 number wasn't released until April 14 this year. So you have seven and a half months to speculate, and argue why your guess is in fact the correct number. Or argue that the official DCPS numbers are wrong. Or argue that they're meaningless.
Is this 15% of all IB population? IF so, this is hardly a surprise and typical for much of upper crust DC, sending their kids to WIS, Sidwell, GDS etc. that are right in the neighborhood.
If it's 15% of overall school population comes form IB, then that's another issue and a little concerning. Even my rising EOTP has 35% IB students, though most have bailed for charters or WOTP.
Not typical of Janney population.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A new year, a new thread.
The 2013-14 number was 13%
The 2014-15 number was 15%
The 2014-15 number wasn't released until April 14 this year. So you have seven and a half months to speculate, and argue why your guess is in fact the correct number. Or argue that the official DCPS numbers are wrong. Or argue that they're meaningless.
Is this 15% of all IB population? IF so, this is hardly a surprise and typical for much of upper crust DC, sending their kids to WIS, Sidwell, GDS etc. that are right in the neighborhood.
If it's 15% of overall school population comes form IB, then that's another issue and a little concerning. Even my rising EOTP has 35% IB students, though most have bailed for charters or WOTP.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A new year, a new thread.
The 2013-14 number was 13%
The 2014-15 number was 15%
The 2014-15 number wasn't released until April 14 this year. So you have seven and a half months to speculate, and argue why your guess is in fact the correct number. Or argue that the official DCPS numbers are wrong. Or argue that they're meaningless.
Is this 15% of all IB population? IF so, this is hardly a surprise and typical for much of upper crust DC, sending their kids to WIS, Sidwell, GDS etc. that are right in the neighborhood.
If it's 15% of overall school population comes form IB, then that's another issue and a little concerning. Even my rising EOTP has 35% IB students, though most have bailed for charters or WOTP.
Anonymous wrote:A new year, a new thread.
The 2013-14 number was 13%
The 2014-15 number was 15%
The 2014-15 number wasn't released until April 14 this year. So you have seven and a half months to speculate, and argue why your guess is in fact the correct number. Or argue that the official DCPS numbers are wrong. Or argue that they're meaningless.