Anonymous wrote:Another thing is that the people who are really pissed about this (his siblings, all of whom were not able to attend) can't really be angry about this outloud, because we are all supposed to be really happy for them. And, I guess, I am really happy for them. I just would have liked a chance to be there in person. -- OP
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think this is popular. Especially for slightly older couples. I'm 30 and a few friends have done this. They just want to be married and start their lives already. Good friend keeps telling me "If we have an engagement party- COME."
Oh, this is asinine. Just call it a fucking wedding and be up-front about it. Why be coy and pretend it's an engagement party if you KNOW you're GETTING MARRIED.
Anonymous wrote:I think this is popular. Especially for slightly older couples. I'm 30 and a few friends have done this. They just want to be married and start their lives already. Good friend keeps telling me "If we have an engagement party- COME."
Anonymous wrote:Good for them. Starting a life with a mound of debt to appease far-flung relatives is foolish.
Anonymous wrote:I know a few people who have thrown surprise weddings. It's all the rage. I think couples do it for many different reasons: to keep the parents from taking over the wedding, to cut down on costs, to keep it small, etc... This just says that they think their marriage is more important than the wedding. I like it. Now they can have their big party in California without that pesky wedding getting in the way of their fun.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know this isn't about me and my feelings....BUT. My cousin, who lives on the west coast was engaged to a great girl. Her parents threw an engagement party in Ohio last weekend which we declined to attend and then they were supposed to have a big wedding in California next year. They decided to get married on the spur of the moment and wound up getting married at the party - with only a few family members in tow. They now say they'll just have a nice party in California at some point. But I am bummed! It's just not the same to have a party, and I am not sure how much of the extended family would actually come out for it. And then the question becomes, do I fly my family of 6 out to California just for a party? It just doesn't feel the same. WWYD?
Assuming they have the party, I'd treat it like a family reunion and go anyway. But yea, the whole thing sounds weird. How spontaneous can it have been? They'd have needed a license and a minister. I'd be a little miffed myself, to be honest. I could see feeling left out because you might have gone if you had known it was really the wedding. Why do you think they did it? Is there some family weirdness they're avoiding?
Anonymous wrote:I know this isn't about me and my feelings....BUT. My cousin, who lives on the west coast was engaged to a great girl. Her parents threw an engagement party in Ohio last weekend which we declined to attend and then they were supposed to have a big wedding in California next year. They decided to get married on the spur of the moment and wound up getting married at the party - with only a few family members in tow. They now say they'll just have a nice party in California at some point. But I am bummed! It's just not the same to have a party, and I am not sure how much of the extended family would actually come out for it. And then the question becomes, do I fly my family of 6 out to California just for a party? It just doesn't feel the same. WWYD?