Anonymous wrote:Most preschools start at 2.5, not 2, so I'm surprised you're even finding a place where you could try to negotiate this.
I do sympathize though - we'll have my oldest DD start KG when she's not 5, rather than having her to an extra year of preschool. Her preschool is part of a preK-8th private, and for the first preschool class, you need to be 3 by the end of the calendar year. So she started when she was 2 (almost 3) for 1st year of preschool, is starting the 2nd year of preschool at 3 (almost 4), and then will enter KG when 4 (almost 5). We still have the option of her just doing a 3rd year of preschool if something dramatically changes and the teachers feel she's not ready - but seems rather unlikely.
I'd look for a private with a Dec 31st cutoff.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Licensing rules change dramatically when kids hit 2, for example, in MD you need 1 teacher for every 3 kids at 1, and 1 for every 6 kids at 2. You also can't have any stairs between the door of the classroom and the outside if you have kids under 2. All of these rules go by the age of the youngest kid in the room.
If a preschool starts at 2, they aren't going to meet the licensing criteria for under 2, so even if he/she's 1 year 364 days they won't take them. However some schools will let a kid start late, while other schools who have enough applicants to fill all their spaces won't bother with that.
The other issue, is that many schools like to move their kids through as a cohort. So, they like all the kids in their 4's class to be eligible for Kindergarten the following year. If your child starts at 2, they'll need 4 years of preschool, while their classmates will leave after 3. This can get complicated, and some schools don't want to deal with it.
This is OP. I was already planning the DC would take the early entrance test for K. Four years of preschool would totally suck.
There's no way you can tell with a 1 year old that they're going to be one of the very few kids for whom early entrance is a good idea. Why would you set your kid up like that?
It's a difference of nine days, so insignificant.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Licensing rules change dramatically when kids hit 2, for example, in MD you need 1 teacher for every 3 kids at 1, and 1 for every 6 kids at 2. You also can't have any stairs between the door of the classroom and the outside if you have kids under 2. All of these rules go by the age of the youngest kid in the room.
If a preschool starts at 2, they aren't going to meet the licensing criteria for under 2, so even if he/she's 1 year 364 days they won't take them. However some schools will let a kid start late, while other schools who have enough applicants to fill all their spaces won't bother with that.
The other issue, is that many schools like to move their kids through as a cohort. So, they like all the kids in their 4's class to be eligible for Kindergarten the following year. If your child starts at 2, they'll need 4 years of preschool, while their classmates will leave after 3. This can get complicated, and some schools don't want to deal with it.
This is OP. I was already planning the DC would take the early entrance test for K. Four years of preschool would totally suck.
There's no way you can tell with a 1 year old that they're going to be one of the very few kids for whom early entrance is a good idea. Why would you set your kid up like that?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Licensing rules change dramatically when kids hit 2, for example, in MD you need 1 teacher for every 3 kids at 1, and 1 for every 6 kids at 2. You also can't have any stairs between the door of the classroom and the outside if you have kids under 2. All of these rules go by the age of the youngest kid in the room.
If a preschool starts at 2, they aren't going to meet the licensing criteria for under 2, so even if he/she's 1 year 364 days they won't take them. However some schools will let a kid start late, while other schools who have enough applicants to fill all their spaces won't bother with that.
The other issue, is that many schools like to move their kids through as a cohort. So, they like all the kids in their 4's class to be eligible for Kindergarten the following year. If your child starts at 2, they'll need 4 years of preschool, while their classmates will leave after 3. This can get complicated, and some schools don't want to deal with it.
This is OP. I was already planning the DC would take the early entrance test for K. Four years of preschool would totally suck.
Anonymous wrote:Licensing rules change dramatically when kids hit 2, for example, in MD you need 1 teacher for every 3 kids at 1, and 1 for every 6 kids at 2. You also can't have any stairs between the door of the classroom and the outside if you have kids under 2. All of these rules go by the age of the youngest kid in the room.
If a preschool starts at 2, they aren't going to meet the licensing criteria for under 2, so even if he/she's 1 year 364 days they won't take them. However some schools will let a kid start late, while other schools who have enough applicants to fill all their spaces won't bother with that.
The other issue, is that many schools like to move their kids through as a cohort. So, they like all the kids in their 4's class to be eligible for Kindergarten the following year. If your child starts at 2, they'll need 4 years of preschool, while their classmates will leave after 3. This can get complicated, and some schools don't want to deal with it.