Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
No, it's a problem, because like the PP said, EVERY 7 year is is potentially gay (but more than likely straight). Why are we even introducing sexual attraction to a young child, instead of them letting themselves figure it out?
It's also patently ridiculous to think that enjoying "girl" things makes him gender non-conforming or potentially gay.
On the contrary, a boy enjoying "girl" things is basically the definition of gender non-conforming, for boys.
Anonymous wrote:
Right, so why label a child as possibly gay? Why introduce that thought into their head? Why not just let things go where they go?
Anonymous wrote:
No, it's a problem, because like the PP said, EVERY 7 year is is potentially gay (but more than likely straight). Why are we even introducing sexual attraction to a young child, instead of them letting themselves figure it out?
It's also patently ridiculous to think that enjoying "girl" things makes him gender non-conforming or potentially gay.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: We are aware he may be gay, but refuse to label our child. As for now he's just DS.
He's seven. And you are labeling him.
When I was six, I wanted to dress like Daddy. I wore brown corduroys and played with trucks. I didn't even own dolls.
I'm now 36, straight, and married to a man. That kind of behavior in a child likely means nothing.
You're really reaching. I suspect this is just another case of parents wanting to feel there is something "special" about their child.
Yes, OP is labeling the child as "possibly gay". I don't perceive that as a problem. Every seven-year-old child is possibly gay (as well as possibly not-gay).
OP is also labeling the child as "gender non-conforming", which seems to me an accurate description of "a very happy boy, who just enjoys things that are stereotypically feminine".
Right, so why label a child as possibly gay? Why introduce that thought into their head? Why not just let things go where they go?
It's only a problem if you think being gay is wrong, and OP specifically asked folks to refrain from homophobia on this thread. I introduce the idea to my kids that they might marry a man OR a woman, which won't make them gay but will make them know that I really don't care if they are.
To the OP - I think gender nonconforming is a good way to think about this. It may change with time or it may not, but I do think that getting him into a therapist to work on resiliency might not be the worst idea.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: We are aware he may be gay, but refuse to label our child. As for now he's just DS.
He's seven. And you are labeling him.
When I was six, I wanted to dress like Daddy. I wore brown corduroys and played with trucks. I didn't even own dolls.
I'm now 36, straight, and married to a man. That kind of behavior in a child likely means nothing.
You're really reaching. I suspect this is just another case of parents wanting to feel there is something "special" about their child.
Yes, OP is labeling the child as "possibly gay". I don't perceive that as a problem. Every seven-year-old child is possibly gay (as well as possibly not-gay).
OP is also labeling the child as "gender non-conforming", which seems to me an accurate description of "a very happy boy, who just enjoys things that are stereotypically feminine".
Right, so why label a child as possibly gay? Why introduce that thought into their head? Why not just let things go where they go?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: We are aware he may be gay, but refuse to label our child. As for now he's just DS.
He's seven. And you are labeling him.
When I was six, I wanted to dress like Daddy. I wore brown corduroys and played with trucks. I didn't even own dolls.
I'm now 36, straight, and married to a man. That kind of behavior in a child likely means nothing.
You're really reaching. I suspect this is just another case of parents wanting to feel there is something "special" about their child.
Yes, OP is labeling the child as "possibly gay". I don't perceive that as a problem. Every seven-year-old child is possibly gay (as well as possibly not-gay).
OP is also labeling the child as "gender non-conforming", which seems to me an accurate description of "a very happy boy, who just enjoys things that are stereotypically feminine".
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: We are aware he may be gay, but refuse to label our child. As for now he's just DS.
He's seven. And you are labeling him.
When I was six, I wanted to dress like Daddy. I wore brown corduroys and played with trucks. I didn't even own dolls.
I'm now 36, straight, and married to a man. That kind of behavior in a child likely means nothing.
You're really reaching. I suspect this is just another case of parents wanting to feel there is something "special" about their child.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: We are aware he may be gay, but refuse to label our child. As for now he's just DS.
He's seven. And you are labeling him.
When I was six, I wanted to dress like Daddy. I wore brown corduroys and played with trucks. I didn't even own dolls.
I'm now 36, straight, and married to a man. That kind of behavior in a child likely means nothing.
You're really reaching. I suspect this is just another case of parents wanting to feel there is something "special" about their child.
Anonymous wrote: We are aware he may be gay, but refuse to label our child. As for now he's just DS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You sound like very loving parents. I think you should talk to a professional - you obviously have questions and want to support your son the best you can, so talking to someone can only help.
I agree.
Anonymous wrote:You sound like very loving parents. I think you should talk to a professional - you obviously have questions and want to support your son the best you can, so talking to someone can only help.