Anonymous wrote:Yes - I have never understood the claims that new and untested schools are high achieving and produce great results. I know families at both of these schools and while most (but not all) of them are mostly satisfied and are not leaving the schools, as they have moved beyond PreK, they have become much more circumspect and those with money are spending a healthy amount on outside tutoring. This does not mean those schools are not great - and I do not intend to imply this. Personally, I want every single public and public charter school in DC to be great. However, a school could be great but not be the right place for your particular child for a variety of reasons (size, language focus if that is not your kid's thing, lack of enough physical movement time, lack of a science focus, etc.).
CAPCS was just shut down not only because of mismanagement but also because they weren't teaching the kids anything.
Anonymous wrote:I think it depends on the charter and the DCPS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In general, charters are a mixed bag, when it comes to school quality.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charter_schools_in_the_United_States#Lower_student_test_scores_and_teacher_issues
In DC, charters are better than DCPS. That's a low bar to clear, but charters have proven they do better at educating the lower-income and minority students.
Anonymous wrote:Anyone who lumps all charters and all DCPS into one mass catagory is just a troll stiring the pot.
Is Janney better than Mundo Verde? Is CMI better than Key? What is the measure you are using to rank these schools? Test scores? Parent satisfaction?
Anonymous wrote:In general, charters are a mixed bag, when it comes to school quality.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charter_schools_in_the_United_States#Lower_student_test_scores_and_teacher_issues