Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:DH has been a Federal employee for almost 11 years. He was at Dept of Defense for 10 years and took a job at Dept of Interior this spring. He really hates it and is frustrated by the staff he has to manage who have been there for a long time and aren't likely to leave anytime soon. Is it too soon to apply for another Fed job? What should he say in interviews? Is it bad to apply for a job in the same agency? As soon as he took this job, he was actually called to interview for another position within the agency but declined. In hindsight that one would have been better as it didn't require him to supervise anyone. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
I've heard from HR types that they don't like seeing jobs on people's resumes that are less than 1 year.
I'm not a hiring manager, or in HR, but I have been in the position of having heavy influence over hiring contractors. I am the queen of hating short stints on resumes. A year here, a year there....since I'm in a technology field, managers told me that they thought it was normal to switch in IT every year. It's not. A candidate with 10 years or so experience should have at least one 3/4 year stint on their resume before I'd even consider interviewing them. Unless the stints were contracts under ONE company. If they have 2 stints of 1 year, a 2 year, and a 6 year or so, that looks better to me. I'm starting to get anxious about people with 3 years, 3 years, 3 years, 3 years. I can see a pattern with people like that where they don't seem to be that great of hires. You can tell that this is mostly personal experience-based. That means that every single person looking at your resume will come in with their own bias. So, you can't really go by that. You just need to do for yourself what you think you need to do. If you're really unhappy, get the hell out.