Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If we did a randomized experiment and randomly assigned children who need homes (adopted kids) to married same sex couples and married hetero couples and the kids did better with the hetero couple families...would you change your mind about:
1) gay adoption
2) surrogate parenting among gays (i.e., bringing a kid into the world for 2 daddy's who otherwise wouldn't be born)?
Just curious. I hate the climate deniers on the right. But we should be scientific about this, no?
Here's the specific thought experiment/proposal:
Randomly assign infants (so that they are, in expectation, average on all traits) to gay vs straight MARRIED couples. We can even do some matching pre-hand to make sure families are of similar SES. Then sit back and watch the process unfold. If there are significant differences, we change family law policy to reflect what is in the best interests of the children, not the adults.
This shouldn't be about adult desires.
Just for argument sake, so if kids do better with gay parents what are you proposing to do?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If we did a randomized experiment and randomly assigned children who need homes (adopted kids) to married same sex couples and married hetero couples and the kids did better with the hetero couple families...would you change your mind about:
1) gay adoption
2) surrogate parenting among gays (i.e., bringing a kid into the world for 2 daddy's who otherwise wouldn't be born)?
Just curious. I hate the climate deniers on the right. But we should be scientific about this, no?
Here's the specific thought experiment/proposal:
Randomly assign infants (so that they are, in expectation, average on all traits) to gay vs straight MARRIED couples. We can even do some matching pre-hand to make sure families are of similar SES. Then sit back and watch the process unfold. If there are significant differences, we change family law policy to reflect what is in the best interests of the children, not the adults.
This shouldn't be about adult desires.
Just for argument sake, so if kids do better with gay parents what are you proposing to do?
Anonymous wrote:If we did a randomized experiment and randomly assigned children who need homes (adopted kids) to married same sex couples and married hetero couples and the kids did better with the hetero couple families...would you change your mind about:
1) gay adoption
2) surrogate parenting among gays (i.e., bringing a kid into the world for 2 daddy's who otherwise wouldn't be born)?
Just curious. I hate the climate deniers on the right. But we should be scientific about this, no?
Here's the specific thought experiment/proposal:
Randomly assign infants (so that they are, in expectation, average on all traits) to gay vs straight MARRIED couples. We can even do some matching pre-hand to make sure families are of similar SES. Then sit back and watch the process unfold. If there are significant differences, we change family law policy to reflect what is in the best interests of the children, not the adults.
This shouldn't be about adult desires.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You don't need to randomly assign babies. All you have to do is to randomly select a large sample of children raised by same sex parents and by heterosexual parents. Account for things like household income and parents' education.
This has been done, actually. Children of gay parents fare slightly better.
Anonymous wrote:You don't need to randomly assign babies. All you have to do is to randomly select a large sample of children raised by same sex parents and by heterosexual parents. Account for things like household income and parents' education.
Anonymous wrote:You don't need to randomly assign babies. All you have to do is to randomly select a large sample of children raised by same sex parents and by heterosexual parents. Account for things like household income and parents' education.
Anonymous wrote:You are an idiot