Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Shepherd.
Thanks. Any reasoning? Do you have any experience with either school? Why don't I see that many posts about Shepherd?
13:37. Not convinced the IT model is sustainable for upper grades (beyond 1st). I also think Shepherd is doing the best job in the city educating at risk and minority kids which is their majority population.
Minority, yes. At-risk, no. Shepherd is 15% at-risk (as of 14-15) and is a case where it is absolutely not appropriate to conflate the two terms.
And I think ITS has some pretty good evidence behind their model (at least in terms of student test scores), but it is a young school and certainly less established than Shepherd. Which is probably good and bad.