Anonymous wrote:My children are in HS now. Most kids at Longfellow were in AAP or Honors. When they were there, there was little difference between Honors and AAP. We found more discrepancy between individual teachers than Honors and AAP at taught. Longfellow does very well for students who are bright and toe the line. It does not do well for those students who have trouble fitting in or straddle different silos (eg AAP and ESOL or AAP and Special Ed).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is a difference between AAP and Honors.
The change was to eliminate Gen Ed and only offer Honors and AAP. The theory is that the teachers will scaffold for the kids who truly need Gen Ed. Don't know how it is in practice. Would hate to stress out kids who aren't ready for Honors. I think, like everything, it depends on the teacher.
They've said they'll make exceptions for students whom they think need a less demanding course than the Honors course; presumably, one example might be ESOL students with limited English proficiency.
Knowing Longfellow, they will make sure that the classes are structured to optimize student success and test scores. The current principal was brought in five or six years ago when Longfellow wasn't making AYP under NCLB because it had certain student groups that were not meeting the SOL benchmarks. She turned it around in a year, and very much has a "no excuses" attitude with both teachers and students.
I don't think this is accurate. She has been there at least 7 years. She has a mixed record with the special ed population.
What does this mean exactly? My 6th grader will be attending this fall-in AAP at center ES with ADHD and IEP. From what we have been told, Longfellow does well with theses students. Do you hear otherwise?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is a difference between AAP and Honors.
The change was to eliminate Gen Ed and only offer Honors and AAP. The theory is that the teachers will scaffold for the kids who truly need Gen Ed. Don't know how it is in practice. Would hate to stress out kids who aren't ready for Honors. I think, like everything, it depends on the teacher.
They've said they'll make exceptions for students whom they think need a less demanding course than the Honors course; presumably, one example might be ESOL students with limited English proficiency.
Knowing Longfellow, they will make sure that the classes are structured to optimize student success and test scores. The current principal was brought in five or six years ago when Longfellow wasn't making AYP under NCLB because it had certain student groups that were not meeting the SOL benchmarks. She turned it around in a year, and very much has a "no excuses" attitude with both teachers and students.
I don't think this is accurate. She has been there at least 7 years. She has a mixed record with the special ed population.
What does this mean exactly? My 6th grader will be attending this fall-in AAP at center ES with ADHD and IEP. From what we have been told, Longfellow does well with theses students. Do you hear otherwise?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is a difference between AAP and Honors.
The change was to eliminate Gen Ed and only offer Honors and AAP. The theory is that the teachers will scaffold for the kids who truly need Gen Ed. Don't know how it is in practice. Would hate to stress out kids who aren't ready for Honors. I think, like everything, it depends on the teacher.
They've said they'll make exceptions for students whom they think need a less demanding course than the Honors course; presumably, one example might be ESOL students with limited English proficiency.
Knowing Longfellow, they will make sure that the classes are structured to optimize student success and test scores. The current principal was brought in five or six years ago when Longfellow wasn't making AYP under NCLB because it had certain student groups that were not meeting the SOL benchmarks. She turned it around in a year, and very much has a "no excuses" attitude with both teachers and students.
I don't think this is accurate. She has been there at least 7 years. She has a mixed record with the special ed population.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is a difference between AAP and Honors.
The change was to eliminate Gen Ed and only offer Honors and AAP. The theory is that the teachers will scaffold for the kids who truly need Gen Ed. Don't know how it is in practice. Would hate to stress out kids who aren't ready for Honors. I think, like everything, it depends on the teacher.
They've said they'll make exceptions for students whom they think need a less demanding course than the Honors course; presumably, one example might be ESOL students with limited English proficiency.
Knowing Longfellow, they will make sure that the classes are structured to optimize student success and test scores. The current principal was brought in five or six years ago when Longfellow wasn't making AYP under NCLB because it had certain student groups that were not meeting the SOL benchmarks. She turned it around in a year, and very much has a "no excuses" attitude with both teachers and students.
I don't think this is accurate. She has been there at least 7 years. She has a mixed record with the special ed population.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is a difference between AAP and Honors.
The change was to eliminate Gen Ed and only offer Honors and AAP. The theory is that the teachers will scaffold for the kids who truly need Gen Ed. Don't know how it is in practice. Would hate to stress out kids who aren't ready for Honors. I think, like everything, it depends on the teacher.
They've said they'll make exceptions for students whom they think need a less demanding course than the Honors course; presumably, one example might be ESOL students with limited English proficiency.
Knowing Longfellow, they will make sure that the classes are structured to optimize student success and test scores. The current principal was brought in five or six years ago when Longfellow wasn't making AYP under NCLB because it had certain student groups that were not meeting the SOL benchmarks. She turned it around in a year, and very much has a "no excuses" attitude with both teachers and students.
Anonymous wrote:There is a difference between AAP and Honors.
The change was to eliminate Gen Ed and only offer Honors and AAP. The theory is that the teachers will scaffold for the kids who truly need Gen Ed. Don't know how it is in practice. Would hate to stress out kids who aren't ready for Honors. I think, like everything, it depends on the teacher.
Anonymous wrote:My children are in HS now. Most kids at Longfellow were in AAP or Honors. When they were there, there was little difference between Honors and AAP. We found more discrepancy between individual teachers than Honors and AAP at taught. Longfellow does very well for students who are bright and toe the line. It does not do well for those students who have trouble fitting in or straddle different silos (eg AAP and ESOL or AAP and Special Ed).
Anonymous wrote:Is it true that in Longfellow MS AAP center, most non-AAP students are "Honor" students? How can this be? Are they just labeling it that for an arbitrary reason?
Also, for those who have experienced LMS AAP program, were you pleased? Likes and dislikes about their AAP program? Is it too crowded?
Anonymous wrote:Is it true that in Longfellow MS AAP center, most non-AAP students are "Honor" students? How can this be? Are they just labeling it that for an arbitrary reason?
Also, for those who have experienced LMS AAP program, were you pleased? Likes and dislikes about their AAP program? Is it too crowded?