Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Op here- a little update. My first beta was 1600 (woohoo) and second beta was 2100. I had my third beta today and it was over 9,000--does that seem unusually high? Am I out of the "chemical pregnancy" risk zone yet?
9000 is way past chemical pregnancy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Op here- a little update. My first beta was 1600 (woohoo) and second beta was 2100. I had my third beta today and it was over 9,000--does that seem unusually high? Am I out of the "chemical pregnancy" risk zone yet?
9000 is way past chemical pregnancy.
Anonymous wrote:Op here- a little update. My first beta was 1600 (woohoo) and second beta was 2100. I had my third beta today and it was over 9,000--does that seem unusually high? Am I out of the "chemical pregnancy" risk zone yet?
Anonymous wrote:Op here- a little update. My first beta was 1600 (woohoo) and second beta was 2100. I had my third beta today and it was over 9,000--does that seem unusually high? Am I out of the "chemical pregnancy" risk zone yet?
Anonymous wrote:Thanks! Now i just need ot be sure it's not chemical.

Anonymous wrote:I realize 6dp6dt is super early to test. I just couldnt wait any longer. What's the liklihood of this being "real"? I did not do a trigger shot so I dont have that to cause a false positive. But I am on all the normal drugs.