Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Apparently the APS School Board likes Murphy, since they extended his contract for four more years last summer, after he'd already been the APS Superintendent five years. I gather they think performance has improved under his watch, but that some teachers and principals don't like being held more accountable.
There are many things to object to about Murphy. None of them are deal breakers, IMO. None of them have to do with "being held more accountable."
Anonymous wrote:
Apparently the APS School Board likes Murphy, since they extended his contract for four more years last summer, after he'd already been the APS Superintendent five years. I gather they think performance has improved under his watch, but that some teachers and principals don't like being held more accountable.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My spouse taught in FX for ten years and has been in APS for ten years.
Basically, prefers the smaller bureaucracy, but I don't think day to day experience is much different. Spouse likes APS less since it acquired a former FX admin as superintendent.
Nobody likes the former Fairfax Co Administrator. Teachers and many Principals loathe him.
APS is great for smaller class sizes and much smaller bureaucracy--agree with this poster!
APS does close a lot less frequently for weather-related events.
Anonymous wrote:My spouse taught in FX for ten years and has been in APS for ten years.
Basically, prefers the smaller bureaucracy, but I don't think day to day experience is much different. Spouse likes APS less since it acquired a former FX admin as superintendent.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Generally speaking, Arlington schools have smaller class sizes.
And lower achievers
No, that's not true at all. What a ridiculous thing to say.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Generally speaking, Arlington schools have smaller class sizes.
And lower achievers
Anonymous wrote:Generally speaking, Arlington schools have smaller class sizes.