Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Because what the Supreme Court was doing was NARROWING the criteria that was previously in place re: Affirmative Action due to the UT at Austin suit. The letter was a reminder to colleges that the ruling essentially said they could indeed still use race as a criteria for admissions decisions. In short, the Administration was pissed at the narrowing of the criteria.
Do you think the Administration wrongly explained the Supreme Court decision? If so, in what way?
I think what they did was wrong because a letter to colleges about the decision can easily be seen as a form of coercive pressure. Reminding them they can still use race as a basis for admissions shows a clear agenda.
An agenda that the Supreme Court has ruled is constitutional.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Because what the Supreme Court was doing was NARROWING the criteria that was previously in place re: Affirmative Action due to the UT at Austin suit. The letter was a reminder to colleges that the ruling essentially said they could indeed still use race as a criteria for admissions decisions. In short, the Administration was pissed at the narrowing of the criteria.
Do you think the Administration wrongly explained the Supreme Court decision? If so, in what way?
I think what they did was wrong because a letter to colleges about the decision can easily be seen as a form of coercive pressure. Reminding them they can still use race as a basis for admissions shows a clear agenda.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Because what the Supreme Court was doing was NARROWING the criteria that was previously in place re: Affirmative Action due to the UT at Austin suit. The letter was a reminder to colleges that the ruling essentially said they could indeed still use race as a criteria for admissions decisions. In short, the Administration was pissed at the narrowing of the criteria.
Do you think the Administration wrongly explained the Supreme Court decision? If so, in what way?
Anonymous wrote:
Because what the Supreme Court was doing was NARROWING the criteria that was previously in place re: Affirmative Action due to the UT at Austin suit. The letter was a reminder to colleges that the ruling essentially said they could indeed still use race as a criteria for admissions decisions. In short, the Administration was pissed at the narrowing of the criteria.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Would you rather it from the LA Times?
http://articles.latimes.com/2013/sep/28/nation/la-na-nn-obama-administration-backs-use-of-race-in-college-admissions-20130927
From the article:
"In a letter to college and university presidents, the departments of Education and Justice reminded educators that the Supreme Court in June ruled that race could still be used as a factor in admissions, as long as the race-based policies were necessary to achieve diversity."
What is controversial about the Administration writing letters about Supreme Court decisions? Isn't that what the Administration should do?
Anonymous wrote:Would you rather it from the LA Times?
http://articles.latimes.com/2013/sep/28/nation/la-na-nn-obama-administration-backs-use-of-race-in-college-admissions-20130927