Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:College admission at most large publics are number-based. Intercept of sat/gpa = admit or deny.
I like that approach but parents who seek a private education usually don't. You reap what you sow.
Not true. Publics are required to fill quotas from the state and often they include racial quotas.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it is over blown on this website. We have are about to have our oldest graduate from HS. He did not save the world, he had one officer position in one of his ECs. He has decent grades, but not stellar (3.9 weighted in FCPS). He will have 7 APs (3 of which are history and don't pertain to the stem he intened to pursue). So far he has been getting 4's. His SAT scores were decent but not spectacular. We decided that he was one and done and did not need to take them again to inch him higher. I would estimate he is in the top 25-20% of his class (FCPS one of the higher "ranked" HS).
We targeted Universities based on his declared area of interest, GPA, SAT scores, Navaince, one- one on one meeting with the college coordinator at our school, Fiske and our budget. Naviance and Fiske are very helpful when gathering data. He applied to 4 schools and got in to all. He will be going to a top ten school in his declared major and is estatic. It was his target school and not his "reach". It is - as far as we can tell- an excellent fit for him.
Listen to the schools, they do a good job of explaining the middle way. Go to the parent events they have. They are informative. There are tons of good schools out there. Visit the schools, step back and let your child lead.
My point isn't the kids themselves. My point is what they are expected to 'accomplish' to be 'worthy'. It's obscene!
Anonymous wrote:College admission at most large publics are number-based. Intercept of sat/gpa = admit or deny.
I like that approach but parents who seek a private education usually don't. You reap what you sow.
Anonymous wrote:I think it is over blown on this website. We have are about to have our oldest graduate from HS. He did not save the world, he had one officer position in one of his ECs. He has decent grades, but not stellar (3.9 weighted in FCPS). He will have 7 APs (3 of which are history and don't pertain to the stem he intened to pursue). So far he has been getting 4's. His SAT scores were decent but not spectacular. We decided that he was one and done and did not need to take them again to inch him higher. I would estimate he is in the top 25-20% of his class (FCPS one of the higher "ranked" HS).
We targeted Universities based on his declared area of interest, GPA, SAT scores, Navaince, one- one on one meeting with the college coordinator at our school, Fiske and our budget. Naviance and Fiske are very helpful when gathering data. He applied to 4 schools and got in to all. He will be going to a top ten school in his declared major and is estatic. It was his target school and not his "reach". It is - as far as we can tell- an excellent fit for him.
Listen to the schools, they do a good job of explaining the middle way. Go to the parent events they have. They are informative. There are tons of good schools out there. Visit the schools, step back and let your child lead.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I understand what you're saying, but I don't actually feel that way. I still believe you can predict about 80% of non-athletic recruits at the most selective schools by the Academic Index. Top 3 in your class, 2300 SAT/35 ACT, a couple of 770 SAT IIs, and you're probably getting in anywhere you apply.
Don't have those? Probably not.
Think about the ridiculousness of what you typed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have really hd a bit of a shock at how many EC's and how accomplished some of these kids are. I'm hoping it's resume padding or my DC will be totally over-run
At the very top schools, its really the stats that matter (GPA and test scores). Regardless of what you read on these boards, Unless you have the tope number 2300 plus etc. you are wasting your time...DESPITE A PAGE OR TWO OF ECs!
Anonymous wrote:I have really hd a bit of a shock at how many EC's and how accomplished some of these kids are. I'm hoping it's resume padding or my DC will be totally over-run
Anonymous wrote:I have really hd a bit of a shock at how many EC's and how accomplished some of these kids are. I'm hoping it's resume padding or my DC will be totally over-run
Anonymous wrote:I understand what you're saying, but I don't actually feel that way. I still believe you can predict about 80% of non-athletic recruits at the most selective schools by the Academic Index. Top 3 in your class, 2300 SAT/35 ACT, a couple of 770 SAT IIs, and you're probably getting in anywhere you apply.
Don't have those? Probably not.