Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's better because it utilizes curricula that encourages critical thinking and problem solving skills.
It uses more 'real life' projects and examples for students to more fully engage in the problem solving challenge.
The English/Vocab curriculum encourages greater understanding of the English language by utilizing methods to understanding via stem words.
This also greatly increases the child's ability for later standardized tests such as the SATs.
The teachers in AAP have more training and are skilled at making learning easily accessible for different types of learners.
They learn techniques and strategies to help a child think more deeply and use these strategies in classroom lessons.
Instead of simply instructing, Socratic seminars are more common to get kids talking, debating and learning.
In a nutshell, AAP is better because it is an empirically greater method of learning and teaching.
Thanks a lot for the reply. Does it mean that the kids in the regular curricula do not get exposed to these things at school?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's better because it utilizes curricula that encourages critical thinking and problem solving skills.
It uses more 'real life' projects and examples for students to more fully engage in the problem solving challenge.
The English/Vocab curriculum encourages greater understanding of the English language by utilizing methods to understanding via stem words.
This also greatly increases the child's ability for later standardized tests such as the SATs.
The teachers in AAP have more training and are skilled at making learning easily accessible for different types of learners.
They learn techniques and strategies to help a child think more deeply and use these strategies in classroom lessons.
Instead of simply instructing, Socratic seminars are more common to get kids talking, debating and learning.
In a nutshell, AAP is better because it is an empirically greater method of learning and teaching.
Thanks a lot for the reply. Does it mean that the kids in the regular curricula do not get exposed to these things at school?
Anonymous wrote:I am just looking for simple clarification.
No BS or political answers or why FCPS is spending on this .... plain simple bullet points on why AAP is better then the regular curriculum. What are the advantages in the long run?
Anonymous wrote:It's better because it utilizes curricula that encourages critical thinking and problem solving skills.
It uses more 'real life' projects and examples for students to more fully engage in the problem solving challenge.
The English/Vocab curriculum encourages greater understanding of the English language by utilizing methods to understanding via stem words.
This also greatly increases the child's ability for later standardized tests such as the SATs.
The teachers in AAP have more training and are skilled at making learning easily accessible for different types of learners.
They learn techniques and strategies to help a child think more deeply and use these strategies in classroom lessons.
Instead of simply instructing, Socratic seminars are more common to get kids talking, debating and learning.
In a nutshell, AAP is better because it is an empirically greater method of learning and teaching.
Anonymous wrote:People,stop replying to the OP. This is the same troll who constantly rants about AAP program in another thread. I guess she has some mental problems.
Anonymous wrote:The curriculum is not "better"--it is appropriate for the kids who are at that particular learning level.
A curriculum designed for English Language Learners is not "better" or "worse" than the standard curriculum. It is the appropriate curriculum for the child with those particular learning requirements.
If testing results indicate that the student would benefit from AAP, they will benefit from it. If testing results don't indicate that, they will be served by the standard curriculum.
Anonymous wrote:The teachers and school system think your kid is smarter. Good things happen. And the kid grows up believing they are smarter.
Anonymous wrote:I am just looking for simple clarification.
No BS or political answers or why FCPS is spending on this .... plain simple bullet points on why AAP is better then the regular curriculum. What are the advantages in the long run?