Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I actually really like this question because I think it highlights the fact that the debate is always over the value of a SAHM vs WOHM. No one ever really questions a man's value to his family or how much he should be financially contributing.
I imagine that was the spirit in which OP posted this thread (or at least that is how I interpreted it).
The bottom line is, every spouse has a different earning potential, families have different needs, and you can't place a dollar sign on a parent whether they work or stay home.
OP here. And yes, thank you, that is the spirit of asking this question.
And so I have bolded what has been written by you, as a thread ender.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why don't you give YOUR opinion OP? What do you think the financial definition of a failure in this area?
OP here. I think any amount that works for a family and any combination of earning and non-earning members or revenue stream (SAHP, WOHP, WAHP, Dual income, single income, single parent, divorced parent, alimony, child-support, govt. assistance) that is useful for raising a family is great.
The financial definition of failure in this area is so skewed and so messed up that I am aghast. Around the nation an HHI of 100K means something. And I am sure that there are many people on DCUM who are making less than that and they feel like failures because this forum is full of people bandying around paychecks of 1M +.
If you believe even half of what you read on here about people's incomes, I have a bridge I want to sell you. Do you also believe all the rich people drive beat up Hondas? That's another dcum truism that cracks me up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why don't you give YOUR opinion OP? What do you think the financial definition of a failure in this area?
OP here. I think any amount that works for a family and any combination of earning and non-earning members or revenue stream (SAHP, WOHP, WAHP, Dual income, single income, single parent, divorced parent, alimony, child-support, govt. assistance) that is useful for raising a family is great.
The financial definition of failure in this area is so skewed and so messed up that I am aghast. Around the nation an HHI of 100K means something. And I am sure that there are many people on DCUM who are making less than that and they feel like failures because this forum is full of people bandying around paychecks of 1M +.
Anonymous wrote:I actually really like this question because I think it highlights the fact that the debate is always over the value of a SAHM vs WOHM. No one ever really questions a man's value to his family or how much he should be financially contributing.
I imagine that was the spirit in which OP posted this thread (or at least that is how I interpreted it).
The bottom line is, every spouse has a different earning potential, families have different needs, and you can't place a dollar sign on a parent whether they work or stay home.
Anonymous wrote:Why don't you give YOUR opinion OP? What do you think the financial definition of a failure in this area?
Anonymous wrote:This forum is just starting to show a really sad side of people.