Anonymous wrote:Wakefield is fine. The differences in graduation rates and test scores for white kids (for example) are not statistically significantly lower than those of white kids (for example) at Wash-Lee or Yorktown. But the perception is there. And if you spend $700K on a house zoned for a school ranked higher and that house gets re-districted, you are looking at a big hit to your equity. Nobody really wants that. as long as the perception that Wakefield is lesser is there, it will affect property values.
That said, I feel like enough white middle-class families are settling in South Arlington that at some point, things should be more balanced. This is especially likely if Wakefield can do something with immersion or a middle school feeding into it can do some sort of STEM focus. Then you'll have kids choosing to go there - like they choose to bus all over town to TJ in Fairfax.
here's the thing. Arlington is not unique. In every school district in the nation, there are schools with more expensive housing and less expensive housing. There are schools with more minority kids and fewer minority kids. I think people just talk about it in Arlington so much because Arlington is so small that it's easy to compare only 3 schools. It's harder in Fairfax - there you have to talk about entire tiers of high schools. You have your top tier (Langley, McLean, Woodson, etc.) and your middle tier (Fairfax, Robinson, Lake Braddock) and your lower tier (every Alexandria school, Edison, Stuart, Falls Church.)
Someone's gotta be the 3rd ranked out of 3.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wouldn't be ok with Wakefield, partly because we are 1/2 mile from Yorktown and very far from Wakefield. I don't want my kid bussed all over town. And partly because I paid a very large amount of money for a very old, not-fully-renovated house to be in-bounds for Yorktown. (would have been fine with W-L.) If I wanted Wakefield, I would have spent less and gotten a nicer house.
So yes, I'd be annoyed.
This is why I would be annoyed as well. I genuinely don't have an issue with my kids going to Wakefield, but the reality is the school boundaries significantly affects property values. A lot of people are not ok with Wakefield, right or wrong.
What is the issue? They have a new building and it sounds like some good programs there.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wouldn't be ok with Wakefield, partly because we are 1/2 mile from Yorktown and very far from Wakefield. I don't want my kid bussed all over town. And partly because I paid a very large amount of money for a very old, not-fully-renovated house to be in-bounds for Yorktown. (would have been fine with W-L.) If I wanted Wakefield, I would have spent less and gotten a nicer house.
So yes, I'd be annoyed.
This is why I would be annoyed as well. I genuinely don't have an issue with my kids going to Wakefield, but the reality is the school boundaries significantly affects property values. A lot of people are not ok with Wakefield, right or wrong.
Anonymous wrote:Have heard nothing but positive things from parents there. FWIW, my kids aren't anywhere near HS age yet, and we're zoned for W-L, but picked our house based on other factors, as we went into it happy to buy anywhere in the county. I'd be more than happy for my kids to attend Wakefield.
Anonymous wrote:I wouldn't be ok with Wakefield, partly because we are 1/2 mile from Yorktown and very far from Wakefield. I don't want my kid bussed all over town. And partly because I paid a very large amount of money for a very old, not-fully-renovated house to be in-bounds for Yorktown. (would have been fine with W-L.) If I wanted Wakefield, I would have spent less and gotten a nicer house.
So yes, I'd be annoyed.
Anonymous wrote:Would people at W-L or Yorktown have a fit if APS proposed to move them to Wakefield?
Honest answers only, please.
Anonymous wrote:Would people at W-L or Yorktown have a fit if APS proposed to move them to Wakefield?
Honest answers only, please.